PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGV vs. WNTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGV vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGV achieves a 17.85% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 9.49% return.


AVGV

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.44%
6M
12.29%
YTD
17.85%
1Y
32.54%
3Y*
20.19%
5Y*
10Y*

WNTR

1D
2.96%
1M
17.94%
6M
21.62%
YTD
9.49%
1Y
127.90%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGV vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVGV and WNTR is -0.36, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025

-0.39

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGV vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGV
AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

WNTR
WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGV vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVGVWNTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.35

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

3.02

+1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.48

7.72

+7.76

AVGV vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGV and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVGV vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGV drawdown since its inception was -17.03%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGV and WNTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGVWNTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.03%

-42.65%

+25.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-42.65%

+34.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.83%

-10.67%

+9.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-20.46%

+18.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

16.63%

-14.52%

Volatility

AVGV vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) is 2.77%, while YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a volatility of 17.89%. This indicates that AVGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WNTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGVWNTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.77%

17.89%

-15.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

47.05%

-36.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.21%

53.81%

-40.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.90%

53.49%

-38.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

53.49%

-38.59%

AVGV vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVGV vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

AVGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%, less than WNTR's 106.86% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
1.62%1.98%2.32%1.14%
WNTR
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF
106.86%58.56%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVGV and WNTR have a correlation of -0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WNTR has higher volatility (17.89%) compared to AVGV (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGV dropped -17.03% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 127.90% vs 32.54% for AVGV. On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, AVGV has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 127.90% return vs 32.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 106.86%, compared with 1.62% for AVGV.

AVGV is categorized as Global Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for AVGV and 1.01% for WNTR.

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGV and WNTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer