AVGV vs. DRIV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVGV (Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF) and DRIV (Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF) are both Global Equities funds. AVGV is actively managed, while DRIV is passively managed. Over the past year, AVGV returned 36.52% vs 92.43% for DRIV. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVGV charges 0.26%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for DRIV.

Performance

AVGV vs. DRIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGV achieves a 16.99% return, which is significantly lower than DRIV's 42.27% return.

AVGV

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 4.06%
• YTD: 16.99%
• 6M: 18.62%
• 1Y: 36.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRIV

• 1D: -1.04%
• 1M: 12.34%
• YTD: 42.27%
• 6M: 41.87%
• 1Y: 92.43%
• 3Y*: 21.80%
• 5Y*: 9.49%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGV vs. DRIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AVGV Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF	16.99%	22.57%	11.26%	11.36%
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	42.27%	30.42%	-5.04%	-2.57%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGV and DRIV is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.81

The correlation between AVGV and DRIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVGV vs. DRIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVGV	DRIV
Financial Services	21.6%	-
Industrials	16.1%	19.4%
Consumer Cyclical	14.5%	26.8%
Energy	13.6%	-
Technology	10.5%	34.0%
Basic Materials	7.3%	14.4%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	-
Communication Services	4.9%	5.4%
Healthcare	4.5%	-
Real Estate	0.8%	-
Utilities	0.7%	-

Return for Risk

AVGV vs. DRIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGV

AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 84
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 82
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

DRIV

DRIV Risk / Return Rank: 92
DRIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
DRIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
DRIV Omega Ratio Rank: 87
DRIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
DRIV Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGV vs. DRIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVGV	DRIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.84	3.70	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.93	4.35	-0.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.55	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.52	6.92	-2.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.72	24.10	-6.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVGV vs. DRIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is comparable to the DRIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGV and DRIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVGV	DRIV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.84	3.70	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.35	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.46	0.54	+0.92

Drawdowns

AVGV vs. DRIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGV drawdown since its inception was -17.03%, smaller than the maximum DRIV drawdown of -41.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGV and DRIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGV	DRIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.03%	-41.93%	+24.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.12%	-13.43%	+5.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-34.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-41.93%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-1.04%	+0.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.30%	-15.13%	+12.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.07%	3.85%	-1.78%

Volatility

AVGV vs. DRIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) is 3.66%, while Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF (DRIV) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that AVGV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVGV	DRIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	9.36%	-5.70%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.86%	19.29%	-9.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.94%	25.14%	-12.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.97%	27.07%	-12.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.97%	27.40%	-12.43%

AVGV vs. DRIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is lower than DRIV's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVGV vs. DRIV - Dividend Comparison

AVGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, more than DRIV's 0.75% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
AVGV Avantis ALL Equity Markets Value ETF	1.89%	1.98%	2.32%	1.14%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
DRIV Global X Autonomous & Electric Vehicles ETF	0.75%	1.07%	2.07%	1.62%	1.24%	0.32%	0.29%	1.23%	2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGV and DRIV in my portfolio?

AVGV and DRIV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVGV or DRIV?

DRIV has higher volatility (9.36%) compared to AVGV (3.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGV dropped -17.03% vs DRIV's -41.93%.

Which ETF is better, AVGV or DRIV?

On 1-year performance, DRIV leads with 92.43% vs 36.52% for AVGV. On fees, AVGV is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, AVGV has been the lower-risk option at 3.66%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVGV or DRIV?

Over the 1-year period, DRIV has performed better with a 92.43% return vs 36.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVGV or DRIV?

AVGV is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for DRIV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVGV or DRIV?

AVGV has the higher dividend yield at 1.89%, compared with 0.75% for DRIV.

What is the main difference between AVGV and DRIV?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for AVGV and 0.68% for DRIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.