PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGV vs. ACWV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGV vs. ACWV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGV achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than ACWV's 5.77% return.


AVGV

1D
1.06%
1M
2.01%
6M
11.09%
YTD
19.44%
1Y
35.33%
3Y*
20.17%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
21.39%

ACWV

1D
0.02%
1M
2.00%
6M
3.53%
YTD
5.77%
1Y
8.71%
3Y*
10.89%
5Y*
5.71%
10Y*
7.22%
ALL TIME*
8.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$13.15M$11.49M$12.64M
$5.38M$4.64M$3.97M

AVGV vs. ACWV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
19.44%22.57%11.26%11.88%
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
5.77%11.04%11.38%4.81%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGV and ACWV is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2023

0.66

The correlation between AVGV and ACWV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVGV vs. ACWV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVGV
ACWV

Financial Services

24.0%
13.5%

Industrials

16.3%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%
5.3%

Technology

11.8%
25.3%

Energy

11.5%
3.5%

Basic Materials

6.6%
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
9.7%

Communication Services

4.8%
11.3%

Healthcare

4.3%
13.8%

Real Estate

0.7%
0.6%

Utilities

0.6%
7.5%

Financial Services

AVGV
24.0%
ACWV
13.5%

Industrials

AVGV
16.3%
ACWV
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

AVGV
14.4%
ACWV
5.3%

Technology

AVGV
11.8%
ACWV
25.3%

Energy

AVGV
11.5%
ACWV
3.5%

Basic Materials

AVGV
6.6%
ACWV
1.5%

Consumer Defensive

AVGV
5.0%
ACWV
9.7%

Communication Services

AVGV
4.8%
ACWV
11.3%

Healthcare

AVGV
4.3%
ACWV
13.8%

Real Estate

AVGV
0.7%
ACWV
0.6%

Utilities

AVGV
0.6%
ACWV
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGV vs. ACWV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVGV
AVGV Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
AVGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGV Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGV Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

ACWV
ACWV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
ACWV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACWV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACWV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ACWV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACWV Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVGV vs. ACWV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) and iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVGVACWVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.20

+0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.37

1.37

+3.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.10

3.90

+13.20

AVGV vs. ACWV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGV Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the ACWV Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGV and ACWV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVGV vs. ACWV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGV drawdown since its inception was -17.03%, smaller than the maximum ACWV drawdown of -28.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGV and ACWV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGVACWVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.03%

-28.82%

+11.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.12%

-6.37%

-1.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.03%

-7.56%

-9.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.34%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-3.10%

+0.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.07%

2.24%

-0.17%

Volatility

AVGV vs. ACWV - Volatility Comparison

Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF (AVGV) has a higher volatility of 3.10% compared to iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF (ACWV) at 2.32%. This indicates that AVGV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGVACWVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

2.32%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.27%

6.41%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.24%

8.05%

+5.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

10.30%

+4.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.87%

12.30%

+2.57%

AVGV vs. ACWV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGV has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than ACWV's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

AVGV vs. ACWV - Dividend Comparison

AVGV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than ACWV's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ACWV
iShares MSCI Global Min Vol Factor ETF
1.90%2.09%2.33%2.41%2.18%1.92%1.77%2.54%2.32%2.04%2.56%2.28%
AVGV
Avantis All Equity Markets Value ETF
1.60%1.98%2.32%1.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVGV and ACWV have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGV has higher volatility (3.10%) compared to ACWV (2.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGV dropped -17.03% vs ACWV's -28.82%.

On 3-year performance, AVGV leads with 20.17% vs 10.89% for ACWV. On fees, ACWV is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ACWV has been the lower-risk option at 2.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVGV has performed better with a 20.17% return vs 10.89%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ACWV is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.26% for AVGV.

ACWV has the higher dividend yield at 1.90%, compared with 1.60% for AVGV.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.26% for AVGV and 0.20% for ACWV.

AVGV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGV and ACWV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer