AVGU vs. ADBG
AVGU (GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF) and ADBG (Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AVGU returned 42.21% vs -72.25% for ADBG. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. AVGU charges 1.50%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for ADBG.
Performance
AVGU vs. ADBG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGU achieves a 6.23% return, which is significantly higher than ADBG's -66.44% return.
AVGU
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.90%
- YTD
- 6.23%
- 1Y
- 42.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ADBG
- 1D
- -8.53%
- 1M
- 14.33%
- 6M
- -56.75%
- YTD
- -66.44%
- 1Y
- -72.25%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVGU vs. ADBG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGU GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF | 6.23% | 33.87% |
ADBG Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF | -66.44% | -17.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGU and ADBG is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGU vs. ADBG — Risk / Return Rank
AVGU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
ADBG
AVGU vs. ADBG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares 2x Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGU) and Leverage Shares 2X Long ADBE Daily ETF (ADBG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVGU | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.78 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.92 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.57 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVGU vs. ADBG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGU drawdown since its inception was -53.30%, smaller than the maximum ADBG drawdown of -84.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGU and ADBG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGU | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.30% | -84.14% | +30.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -53.30% | -78.97% | +25.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.05% | -79.62% | +40.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.88% | -44.66% | +22.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 45.89% | — |
Volatility
AVGU vs. ADBG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGU | ADBG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.83% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 61.54% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 94.18% | 71.09% | +23.09% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 94.18% | 69.34% | +24.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 94.18% | 69.34% | +24.84% |
AVGU vs. ADBG - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGU has a 1.50% expense ratio, which is higher than ADBG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGU vs. ADBG - Dividend Comparison
Neither AVGU nor ADBG has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGU and ADBG have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, AVGU leads with 42.21% vs -72.25% for ADBG. On fees, ADBG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AVGU has performed better with a 42.21% return vs -72.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ADBG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.50% for AVGU.
AVGU and ADBG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.50% for AVGU and 0.75% for ADBG.
Find the right allocation for AVGU and ADBG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer