AVGO vs. MPWR
AVGO (Broadcom Inc.) and MPWR (Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 10 years, AVGO returned 40.96%/yr vs 37.94%/yr for MPWR. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
AVGO vs. MPWR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGO achieves a 10.62% return, which is significantly lower than MPWR's 74.38% return. Over the past 10 years, AVGO has outperformed MPWR with an annualized return of 40.96%, while MPWR has yielded a comparatively lower 37.94% annualized return.
AVGO
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -10.14%
- YTD
- 10.62%
- 6M
- 6.58%
- 1Y
- 54.87%
- 3Y*
- 67.17%
- 5Y*
- 55.09%
- 10Y*
- 40.96%
MPWR
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- 1.76%
- YTD
- 74.38%
- 6M
- 67.26%
- 1Y
- 136.15%
- 3Y*
- 44.43%
- 5Y*
- 36.35%
- 10Y*
- 37.94%
AVGO vs. MPWR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 10.62% | 50.63% | 110.49% | 104.18% | -13.27% | 56.48% | 44.88% | 29.05% | 2.18% | 48.19% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 74.38% | 54.45% | -5.55% | 79.78% | -27.78% | 35.49% | 107.49% | 54.80% | 4.49% | 38.23% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGO and MPWR is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2009 | 0.59 |
The correlation between AVGO and MPWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.45 (1 year) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AVGO:
$1.86T
MPWR:
$77.67B
AVGO:
$6.01
MPWR:
$13.89
AVGO:
63.58
MPWR:
113.54
AVGO:
0.79
MPWR:
1.43
AVGO:
24.70
MPWR:
25.93
AVGO:
21.24
MPWR:
21.12
AVGO:
$75.47B
MPWR:
$2.96B
AVGO:
$50.53B
MPWR:
$1.63B
AVGO:
$41.76B
MPWR:
$861.78M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGO vs. MPWR — Risk / Return Rank
AVGO
MPWR
AVGO vs. MPWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVGO | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.37 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.77 | 5.43 | -3.66 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.11 | 14.45 | -10.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVGO vs. MPWR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGO drawdown since its inception was -48.30%, smaller than the maximum MPWR drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGO and MPWR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGO | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.30% | -72.27% | +23.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.67% | -22.45% | -6.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -41.15% | -51.65% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -41.15% | -51.65% | +10.50% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.30% | -51.65% | +3.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -20.66% | -6.66% | -14.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.98% | -17.71% | +9.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 8.44% | +3.86% |
Volatility
AVGO vs. MPWR - Volatility Comparison
Broadcom Inc. (AVGO) and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. (MPWR) have volatilities of 20.53% and 20.33%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGO | MPWR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 20.53% | 20.33% | +0.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 35.04% | 37.42% | -2.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 45.57% | 48.53% | -2.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.39% | 53.53% | -10.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.52% | 47.23% | -7.71% |
Dividends
AVGO vs. MPWR - Dividend Comparison
AVGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, more than MPWR's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGO Broadcom Inc. | 0.65% | 0.70% | 0.94% | 1.71% | 3.02% | 2.24% | 3.05% | 3.54% | 3.11% | 1.87% | 1.43% | 1.13% |
MPWR Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. | 0.42% | 0.69% | 0.85% | 0.63% | 0.85% | 0.49% | 0.55% | 0.90% | 1.03% | 0.71% | 0.98% | 1.26% |
Financials
AVGO vs. MPWR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Broadcom Inc. and Monolithic Power Systems, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AVGO vs. MPWR - Profitability Comparison
AVGO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a gross profit of 14.92B and revenue of 22.19B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 67.2%.
MPWR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.07M and revenue of 804.19M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.3%.
AVGO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported an operating income of 10.87B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in an operating margin of 49.0%.
MPWR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported an operating income of 241.15M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in an operating margin of 30.0%.
AVGO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Broadcom Inc. reported a net income of 9.31B and revenue of 22.19B, resulting in a net margin of 42.0%.
MPWR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. reported a net income of 193.23M and revenue of 804.19M, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGO and MPWR have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVGO has higher volatility (20.53%) compared to MPWR (20.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGO dropped -48.30% vs MPWR's -72.27%.
MPWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVGO and MPWR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer