AVGI.L vs. 2AMD.L
AVGI.L (IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP) and 2AMD.L (Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP) are both exchange-traded funds - AVGI.L is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares, while 2AMD.L is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX Leveraged 2X AMD Index. AVGI.L is actively managed, while 2AMD.L is passively managed. Over the past year, AVGI.L returned 9.27% vs 596.88% for 2AMD.L. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVGI.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for 2AMD.L.
Performance
AVGI.L vs. 2AMD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AVGI.L is traded in USD, while 2AMD.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the 2AMD.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGI.L achieves a 0.44% return, which is significantly lower than 2AMD.L's 372.79% return.
AVGI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.10%
- 6M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 9.27%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
2AMD.L
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 305.09%
- YTD
- 372.79%
- 1Y
- 596.88%
- 3Y*
- 84.30%
- 5Y*
- 40.95%
- 10Y*
- —
AVGI.L vs. 2AMD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGI.L IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP | 0.44% | 11,438.21% |
2AMD.L Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP | 372.79% | 96.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGI.L and 2AMD.L is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVGI.L vs. 2AMD.L — Risk / Return Rank
AVGI.L
2AMD.L
AVGI.L vs. 2AMD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP (AVGI.L) and Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AVGI.L | 2AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.50 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.22 | 13.33 | -13.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 26.28 | -25.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AVGI.L vs. 2AMD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGI.L drawdown since its inception was -43.06%, smaller than the maximum 2AMD.L drawdown of -99.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGI.L and 2AMD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGI.L | 2AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.06% | -99.46% | +56.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.06% | -54.75% | +11.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -89.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -99.46% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.34% | -87.47% | +53.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.83% | -71.13% | +48.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.58% | 27.84% | -0.26% |
Volatility
AVGI.L vs. 2AMD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP (AVGI.L) is 11.71%, while Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP (2AMD.L) has a volatility of 45.42%. This indicates that AVGI.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than 2AMD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVGI.L | 2AMD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.71% | 45.42% | -33.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.43% | 97.76% | -68.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.96% | 132.35% | -72.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9,756.97% | 4,261.36% | +5,495.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9,756.97% | 3,853.17% | +5,903.80% |
AVGI.L vs. 2AMD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGI.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than 2AMD.L's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVGI.L vs. 2AMD.L - Dividend Comparison
AVGI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 52.93%, while 2AMD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
2AMD.L Leverage Shares 2x Advanced Micro Devices ETC GBP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
AVGI.L IncomeShares Broadcom (AVGO) Options ETP | 52.93% | 10.33% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVGI.L and 2AMD.L have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AVGI.L is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AVGI.L is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for 2AMD.L.
AVGI.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while 2AMD.L is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for AVGI.L and 0.75% for 2AMD.L.
Find the right allocation for AVGI.L and 2AMD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer