PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGG vs. TSLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGG vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGG achieves a 71.17% return, which is significantly higher than TSLG's -20.82% return.


AVGG

1D
-0.88%
1M
29.67%
YTD
71.17%
6M
37.06%
1Y
161.88%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSLG

1D
-0.14%
1M
13.71%
YTD
-20.82%
6M
-21.35%
1Y
7.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGG vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVGG and TSLG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2025

0.24

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGG vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGG
AVGG Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
AVGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGG Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGG Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

TSLG
TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGG vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVGGTSLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.09

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

0.13

+2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.75

0.28

+6.47

AVGG vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGG Sharpe Ratio is 1.90, which is higher than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGG and TSLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVGGTSLGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.90

0.08

+1.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.52

-0.34

+2.86

Drawdowns

AVGG vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGG drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, smaller than the maximum TSLG drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGG and TSLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGGTSLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.77%

-82.86%

+29.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.77%

-54.61%

+0.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.88%

-60.00%

+59.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.71%

-58.73%

+41.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

24.09%

26.63%

-2.54%

Volatility

AVGG vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) have volatilities of 23.84% and 24.41%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGGTSLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

23.84%

24.41%

-0.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

61.82%

54.58%

+7.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

86.10%

92.53%

-6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

84.79%

115.31%

-30.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

84.79%

115.31%

-30.52%

AVGG vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVGG vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

AVGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than TSLG's 8.27% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVGG and TSLG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TSLG has higher volatility (24.41%) compared to AVGG (23.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGG dropped -53.77% vs TSLG's -82.86%.

On 1-year performance, AVGG leads with 161.88% vs 7.28% for TSLG. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, AVGG has been the lower-risk option at 23.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGG has performed better with a 161.88% return vs 7.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for AVGG.

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.27%, compared with 1.32% for AVGG.

Their fees differ too: 0.76% for AVGG and 0.75% for TSLG.

AVGG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGG and TSLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer