PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGG vs. RTXG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGG vs. RTXG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGG achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly higher than RTXG's -4.29% return.


AVGG

1D
-5.88%
1M
-19.99%
YTD
2.81%
6M
0.66%
1Y
63.23%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

RTXG

1D
5.07%
1M
9.01%
YTD
-4.29%
6M
-6.71%
1Y
41.48%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGG vs. RTXG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVGG and RTXG is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGG vs. RTXG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGG
AVGG Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
AVGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGG Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGG Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

RTXG
RTXG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
RTXG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RTXG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
RTXG Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
RTXG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
RTXG Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGG vs. RTXG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVGGRTXGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.18

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

1.11

+0.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.49

2.78

-0.29

AVGG vs. RTXG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGG Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is comparable to the RTXG Sharpe Ratio of 0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGG and RTXG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVGG vs. RTXG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGG drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, which is greater than RTXG's maximum drawdown of -37.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGG and RTXG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGGRTXGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.77%

-37.49%

-16.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-53.77%

-37.49%

-16.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.47%

-26.83%

-13.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.53%

-9.63%

-8.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.42%

14.97%

+10.45%

Volatility

AVGG vs. RTXG - Volatility Comparison

Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) has a higher volatility of 44.97% compared to Leverage Shares 2X Long RTX Daily ETF (RTXG) at 18.81%. This indicates that AVGG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RTXG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGGRTXGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

44.97%

18.81%

+26.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

67.51%

38.71%

+28.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

92.96%

50.00%

+42.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

90.61%

50.19%

+40.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.61%

50.19%

+40.42%

AVGG vs. RTXG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than RTXG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVGG vs. RTXG - Dividend Comparison

AVGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than RTXG's 6.65% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVGG and RTXG have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVGG has higher volatility (44.97%) compared to RTXG (18.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGG dropped -53.77% vs RTXG's -37.49%.

On 1-year performance, AVGG leads with 63.23% vs 41.48% for RTXG. On fees, RTXG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, RTXG has been the lower-risk option at 18.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVGG has performed better with a 63.23% return vs 41.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RTXG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for AVGG.

RTXG has the higher dividend yield at 6.65%, compared with 2.20% for AVGG.

Their fees differ too: 0.76% for AVGG and 0.75% for RTXG.

RTXG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.83 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGG and RTXG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer