AVGG vs. BMNG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVGG (Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF) and BMNG (Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Leverage Shares. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVGG charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BMNG.

Performance

AVGG vs. BMNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGG achieves a 71.17% return, which is significantly higher than BMNG's -75.13% return.

AVGG

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 29.67%
• YTD: 71.17%
• 6M: 37.06%
• 1Y: 161.88%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BMNG

• 1D: -12.21%
• 1M: -48.30%
• YTD: -75.13%
• 6M: -85.16%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGG vs. BMNG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AVGG Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF	71.17%	-14.54%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	-75.13%	-81.37%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGG and BMNG is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025	0.38

Return for Risk

AVGG vs. BMNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGG

AVGG Risk / Return Rank: 53
AVGG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
AVGG Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
AVGG Omega Ratio Rank: 51
AVGG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
AVGG Martin Ratio Rank: 43

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGG vs. BMNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF (AVGG) and Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF (BMNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVGG	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.90	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.03	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.75	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVGG	BMNG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.52	-0.52	+3.04

Drawdowns

AVGG vs. BMNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGG drawdown since its inception was -53.77%, smaller than the maximum BMNG drawdown of -95.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGG and BMNG.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVGG	BMNG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.77%	-95.36%	+41.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.88%	-95.36%	+94.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.71%	-81.38%	+63.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.09%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	AVGG	BMNG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	61.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	86.10%	191.58%	-105.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	84.79%	191.58%	-106.79%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	84.79%	191.58%	-106.79%

AVGG vs. BMNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGG has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than BMNG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVGG vs. BMNG - Dividend Comparison

AVGG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, while BMNG has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AVGG Leverage Shares 2X Long AVGO Daily ETF	1.32%	2.26%
BMNG Leverage Shares 2X Long BMNR Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVGG and BMNG in my portfolio?

AVGG and BMNG have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, AVGG or BMNG?

On fees, BMNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVGG or BMNG?

BMNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.76% for AVGG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVGG or BMNG?

AVGG has the higher dividend yield at 1.32%, compared with 0.00% for BMNG.

What is the main difference between AVGG and BMNG?

Their fees differ too: 0.76% for AVGG and 0.75% for BMNG.