AVGC.L vs. TDGB.L
Compare and contrast key facts about Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L).
AVGC.L and TDGB.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. AVGC.L is a passively managed fund by Avantis that tracks the performance of the MSCI World IMI Index. It was launched on Sep 25, 2024. TDGB.L is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Developed Markets Large Cap Dividend Leaders Screened Select Index. It was launched on May 23, 2016. Both AVGC.L and TDGB.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
AVGC.L vs. TDGB.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
AVGC.L vs. TDGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AVGC.L Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 1.59% | 25.16% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 8.09% | 22.99% |
Different Trading Currencies
AVGC.L is traded in USD, while TDGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the TDGB.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVGC.L achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than TDGB.L's 8.09% return.
AVGC.L
- 1D
- 2.59%
- 1M
- -3.53%
- YTD
- 1.59%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TDGB.L
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- YTD
- 8.09%
- 6M
- 16.71%
- 1Y
- 32.96%
- 3Y*
- 22.84%
- 5Y*
- 17.61%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
AVGC.L vs. TDGB.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVGC.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than TDGB.L's 0.38% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
AVGC.L vs. TDGB.L — Risk / Return Rank
AVGC.L
TDGB.L
AVGC.L vs. TDGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (AVGC.L) and VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF (TDGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVGC.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.24 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.50 | 0.89 | +1.61 |
Correlation
The correlation between AVGC.L and TDGB.L is 0.60, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
AVGC.L vs. TDGB.L - Dividend Comparison
AVGC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TDGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.25%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVGC.L Avantis Global Equity UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TDGB.L VanEck Morningstar Developed Markets Dividend Leaders UCITS ETF | 3.25% | 3.50% | 4.27% | 4.93% | 4.40% | 4.06% | 4.16% | 4.52% |
Drawdowns
AVGC.L vs. TDGB.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVGC.L drawdown since its inception was -7.96%, smaller than the maximum TDGB.L drawdown of -37.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGC.L and TDGB.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVGC.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.96% | -29.60% | +21.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -12.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.78% | -0.56% | -4.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.03% | -3.75% | +2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.34% | — |
Volatility
AVGC.L vs. TDGB.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| AVGC.L | TDGB.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.52% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.95% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.72% | 14.47% | -2.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.72% | 14.22% | -2.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.72% | 16.90% | -5.18% |