PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVGB vs. AVNV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVGB vs. AVNV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) and Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVGB achieves a 1.26% return, which is significantly lower than AVNV's 11.31% return.


AVGB

1D
0.02%
1M
0.62%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.31%
1Y
4.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AVNV

1D
0.37%
1M
-3.58%
YTD
11.31%
6M
10.88%
1Y
31.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVGB vs. AVNV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AVGB
Avantis Credit ETF
1.26%4.82%
AVNV
Avantis All International Markets Value ETF
11.31%33.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AVGB and AVNV is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVGB vs. AVNV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVGB
AVGB Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
AVGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVGB Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
AVGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVGB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

AVNV
AVNV Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AVNV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVNV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVNV Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
AVNV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVNV Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVGB vs. AVNV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) and Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVGBAVNVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.37

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.10

2.69

-0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.71

10.19

-2.47

AVGB vs. AVNV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the AVNV Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVGB and AVNV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVGB vs. AVNV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVGB drawdown since its inception was -2.12%, smaller than the maximum AVNV drawdown of -13.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVGB and AVNV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVGBAVNVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-13.89%

+11.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.12%

-11.66%

+9.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.68%

+3.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.33%

-2.49%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.58%

3.07%

-2.49%

Volatility

AVGB vs. AVNV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Credit ETF (AVGB) is 0.78%, while Avantis All International Markets Value ETF (AVNV) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that AVGB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVNV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVGBAVNVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

6.27%

-5.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.01%

13.60%

-11.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51%

15.56%

-13.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.51%

15.04%

-12.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.51%

15.04%

-12.53%

AVGB vs. AVNV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVGB has a 0.19% expense ratio, which is lower than AVNV's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVGB vs. AVNV - Dividend Comparison

AVGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.23%, less than AVNV's 4.01% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
AVGB
Avantis Credit ETF
3.23%3.49%0.00%0.00%
AVNV
Avantis All International Markets Value ETF
4.01%3.14%3.51%1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVGB and AVNV have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVNV has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to AVGB (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVGB dropped -2.12% vs AVNV's -13.89%.

On 1-year performance, AVNV leads with 31.22% vs 4.43% for AVGB. On fees, AVGB is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, AVGB has been the lower-risk option at 0.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, AVNV has performed better with a 31.22% return vs 4.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVGB is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for AVNV.

AVNV has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 3.23% for AVGB.

AVGB is categorized as Global Bonds, while AVNV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.19% for AVGB and 0.34% for AVNV.

AVNV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVGB and AVNV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer