PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVERX vs. FALGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVERX vs. FALGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


AVERX

1D
0.51%
1M
0.74%
YTD
19.40%
6M
16.42%
1Y
20.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FALGX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
0.00%
6M
0.00%
1Y
11.92%
3Y*
16.55%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
12.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVERX vs. FALGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
19.40%0.37%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
0.00%23.26%

Correlation

The correlation between AVERX and FALGX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2025

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVERX vs. FALGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVERX
AVERX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
AVERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVERX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AVERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVERX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

FALGX
FALGX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
FALGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FALGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
FALGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FALGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FALGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVERX vs. FALGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) and Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVERXFALGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.45

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.64

-0.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

4.45

+0.10

AVERX vs. FALGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVERX Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is lower than the FALGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVERX and FALGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVERXFALGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.05

1.66

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.44

+0.51

Drawdowns

AVERX vs. FALGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVERX drawdown since its inception was -11.33%, smaller than the maximum FALGX drawdown of -64.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVERX and FALGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVERXFALGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.33%

-64.07%

+52.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.27%

-5.06%

-5.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.11%

-4.20%

-2.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.74%

-14.43%

+8.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.36%

2.83%

+1.53%

Volatility

AVERX vs. FALGX - Volatility Comparison

Ave Maria Value Focused Fund (AVERX) has a higher volatility of 4.59% compared to Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M (FALGX) at 0.00%. This indicates that AVERX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FALGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVERXFALGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.59%

0.00%

+4.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.73%

4.10%

+10.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

8.02%

+11.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.85%

16.65%

+2.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.85%

18.66%

+0.19%

AVERX vs. FALGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVERX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than FALGX's 1.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVERX vs. FALGX - Dividend Comparison

AVERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than FALGX's 5.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AVERX
Ave Maria Value Focused Fund
0.34%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FALGX
Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class M
5.76%5.76%0.00%3.20%1.91%6.44%5.25%8.39%16.99%6.42%1.85%2.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVERX and FALGX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVERX has higher volatility (4.59%) compared to FALGX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVERX dropped -11.33% vs FALGX's -64.07%.

FALGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVERX and FALGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer