AVEM vs. IBIT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

AVEM (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - AVEM is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Avantis, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. AVEM is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, AVEM returned 47.18% vs -39.67% for IBIT. At a 0.36 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AVEM charges 0.33%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.

Performance

AVEM vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVEM achieves a 25.08% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -27.41% return.

AVEM

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 1.30%
• YTD: 25.08%
• 6M: 27.86%
• 1Y: 47.18%
• 3Y*: 24.04%
• 5Y*: 9.66%
• 10Y*: —

IBIT

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -21.94%
• YTD: -27.41%
• 6M: -29.61%
• 1Y: -39.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVEM vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF	25.08%	34.48%	11.04%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	-27.41%	-6.41%	89.87%

Correlation

The correlation between AVEM and IBIT is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2024	0.36

The correlation between AVEM and IBIT shifts across timeframes, from 0.36 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

AVEM vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVEM

AVEM Risk / Return Rank: 77
AVEM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
AVEM Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
AVEM Omega Ratio Rank: 79
AVEM Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
AVEM Martin Ratio Rank: 79

IBIT

IBIT Risk / Return Rank: 3
IBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
IBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
IBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVEM vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AVEM	IBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	-0.92	+3.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	-1.30	+4.09
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.85	+0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.46	-0.78	+4.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.15	-1.37	+14.53

AVEM vs. IBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVEM Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is higher than the IBIT Sharpe Ratio of -0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVEM and IBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AVEM vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVEM drawdown since its inception was -36.05%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEM and IBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVEM	IBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.05%	-52.11%	+16.06%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.13%	-52.11%	+38.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.02%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.33%	-49.45%	+46.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.07%	-16.53%	+6.46%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.45%	29.64%	-26.19%

Volatility

AVEM vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF (AVEM) is 10.91%, while iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that AVEM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVEM	IBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.91%	12.07%	-1.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.79%	34.45%	-15.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.17%	44.10%	-22.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.71%	50.26%	-31.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.76%	50.26%	-29.50%

AVEM vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVEM has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVEM vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison

AVEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVEM Avantis Emerging Markets Equity ETF	2.59%	2.45%	3.17%	3.06%	2.77%	2.61%	1.60%	0.35%
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVEM and IBIT in my portfolio?

AVEM and IBIT have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVEM or IBIT?

IBIT has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to AVEM (10.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVEM dropped -36.05% vs IBIT's -52.11%.

Which ETF is better, AVEM or IBIT?

On 1-year performance, AVEM leads with 47.18% vs -39.67% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, AVEM has been the lower-risk option at 10.91%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVEM or IBIT?

Over the 1-year period, AVEM has performed better with a 47.18% return vs -39.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVEM or IBIT?

IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.33% for AVEM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVEM or IBIT?

AVEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.

What is the main difference between AVEM and IBIT?

AVEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.33% for AVEM and 0.25% for IBIT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVEM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs -0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.