PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVEM.L vs. XDEX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVEM.L vs. XDEX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AVEM.L is traded in USD, while XDEX.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XDEX.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVEM.L achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly lower than XDEX.L's 30.45% return.


AVEM.L

1D
-1.11%
1M
-2.81%
YTD
16.34%
6M
18.51%
1Y
37.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XDEX.L

1D
-4.90%
1M
-2.57%
YTD
30.45%
6M
35.16%
1Y
61.85%
3Y*
23.56%
5Y*
11.02%
10Y*
12.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVEM.L vs. XDEX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between AVEM.L and XDEX.L is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2025

0.85

The correlation between AVEM.L and XDEX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVEM.L vs. XDEX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVEM.L
AVEM.L Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
AVEM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVEM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVEM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
AVEM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVEM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEX.L
XDEX.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
XDEX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVEM.L vs. XDEX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEM.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVEM.LXDEX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.55

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

4.13

-1.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.01

16.05

-5.05

AVEM.L vs. XDEX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVEM.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is lower than the XDEX.L Sharpe Ratio of 3.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVEM.L and XDEX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVEM.LXDEX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01

3.00

-0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.91

0.64

+1.27

Drawdowns

AVEM.L vs. XDEX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVEM.L drawdown since its inception was -13.87%, smaller than the maximum XDEX.L drawdown of -32.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVEM.L and XDEX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVEM.LXDEX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.87%

-32.75%

+18.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.05%

-14.99%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.02%

-7.74%

+0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-6.97%

+4.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

3.86%

-0.43%

Volatility

AVEM.L vs. XDEX.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEM.L) is 7.97%, while Xtrackers MSCI Emerging Markets ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1C (XDEX.L) has a volatility of 10.42%. This indicates that AVEM.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEX.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVEM.LXDEX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

10.42%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.98%

18.63%

-2.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.86%

20.67%

-1.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.86%

17.90%

+1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

17.02%

+2.84%

AVEM.L vs. XDEX.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVEM.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEX.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVEM.L vs. XDEX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither AVEM.L nor XDEX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


AVEM.L and XDEX.L have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEX.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEX.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AVEM.L.

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AVEM.L and 0.18% for XDEX.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVEM.L and XDEX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer