AVEM.L vs. HEMC.L
AVEM.L (Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and HEMC.L (HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. AVEM.L is actively managed, while HEMC.L is passively managed. AVEM.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for HEMC.L.
Performance
AVEM.L vs. HEMC.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
AVEM.L is traded in USD, while HEMC.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HEMC.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
AVEM.L
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- -2.81%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 18.51%
- 1Y
- 37.78%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HEMC.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVEM.L vs. HEMC.L — Risk / Return Rank
AVEM.L
HEMC.L
AVEM.L vs. HEMC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis Emerging Markets Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (AVEM.L) and HSBC MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (HEMC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVEM.L | HEMC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.89 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.01 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVEM.L | HEMC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.01 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.91 | — | — |
Drawdowns
AVEM.L vs. HEMC.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVEM.L | HEMC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.02% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | — | — |
Volatility
AVEM.L vs. HEMC.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVEM.L | HEMC.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.97% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.98% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.86% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.86% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.86% | — | — |
AVEM.L vs. HEMC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVEM.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than HEMC.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVEM.L vs. HEMC.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither AVEM.L nor HEMC.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, HEMC.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HEMC.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for AVEM.L.
They also come from different issuers: Avantis and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for AVEM.L and 0.15% for HEMC.L.
Find the right allocation for AVEM.L and HEMC.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer