PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVDV vs. YCS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVDV vs. YCS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVDV achieves a 13.72% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 4.11% return.


AVDV

1D
0.67%
1M
0.88%
6M
5.81%
YTD
13.72%
1Y
35.11%
3Y*
25.09%
5Y*
13.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.93%

YCS

1D
-2.97%
1M
-5.17%
6M
5.08%
YTD
4.11%
1Y
21.34%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
22.90%
10Y*
13.21%
ALL TIME*
6.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$75.45M$103.53M$84.89M
$2.37M$2.29M$1.56M

AVDV vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
13.72%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%11.78%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
4.11%9.04%35.41%28.70%29.09%22.38%-11.18%2.98%

Correlation

The correlation between AVDV and YCS is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

-0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

-0.19

The correlation between AVDV and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.33 (1 year) to -0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVDV vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

YCS
YCS Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
YCS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
YCS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
YCS Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
YCS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
YCS Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AVDV vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVDVYCSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.26

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.67

2.53

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.69

9.53

+0.16

AVDV vs. YCS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the YCS Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVDV and YCS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVDV vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVDV drawdown since its inception was -43.01%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDV and YCS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVDVYCSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.01%

-49.56%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-8.48%

-4.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-23.05%

+8.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-27.32%

-0.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.32%

-8.48%

+5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.71%

-19.75%

+13.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

2.24%

+1.39%

Volatility

AVDV vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) is 5.48%, while ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) has a volatility of 5.88%. This indicates that AVDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YCS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVDVYCSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.48%

5.88%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.47%

11.84%

+2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.84%

16.43%

+0.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.44%

21.21%

-3.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.71%

18.61%

+1.10%

AVDV vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVDV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVDV vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison

AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.78%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%
YCS
ProShares UltraShort Yen
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVDV and YCS have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

YCS has higher volatility (5.88%) compared to AVDV (5.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDV dropped -43.01% vs YCS's -49.56%.

On 5-year performance, YCS leads with 22.90% vs 13.73% for AVDV. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, YCS has performed better with a 22.90% return vs 13.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.

AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.

AVDV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVDV and 1.00% for YCS.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVDV and YCS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer