PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVDV vs. KMLM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVDV vs. KMLM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVDV achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than KMLM's 9.83% return.


AVDV

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
13.22%
6M
16.29%
1Y
40.16%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*

KMLM

1D
0.42%
1M
-2.33%
YTD
9.83%
6M
12.35%
1Y
12.99%
3Y*
-0.87%
5Y*
4.40%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVDV vs. KMLM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
13.22%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.62%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
9.83%-2.98%-1.69%-5.66%30.61%7.04%5.40%

Correlation

The correlation between AVDV and KMLM is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020

-0.06

The correlation between AVDV and KMLM shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (5 years) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVDV vs. KMLM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

KMLM
KMLM Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
KMLM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KMLM Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
KMLM Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
KMLM Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
KMLM Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVDV vs. KMLM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVDVKMLMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.21

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

2.07

+0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

6.61

+5.73

AVDV vs. KMLM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the KMLM Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVDV and KMLM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVDVKMLMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

1.14

+1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.30

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.48

+0.29

Drawdowns

AVDV vs. KMLM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVDV drawdown since its inception was -43.01%, which is greater than KMLM's maximum drawdown of -27.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDV and KMLM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVDVKMLMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.01%

-27.47%

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-6.30%

-6.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-22.28%

+8.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

-27.47%

-0.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

-14.36%

+10.62%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-12.74%

+5.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

1.97%

+1.29%

Volatility

AVDV vs. KMLM - Volatility Comparison

Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a higher volatility of 5.49% compared to KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF (KMLM) at 4.27%. This indicates that AVDV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than KMLM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVDVKMLMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

4.27%

+1.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

9.68%

+3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

11.46%

+4.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

14.62%

+2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

14.72%

+5.03%

AVDV vs. KMLM - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVDV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than KMLM's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVDV vs. KMLM - Dividend Comparison

AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than KMLM's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.81%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%
KMLM
KFA Mount Lucas Index Strategy ETF
4.57%5.02%0.82%0.00%13.22%6.94%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVDV and KMLM have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (5.49%) compared to KMLM (4.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDV dropped -43.01% vs KMLM's -27.47%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.33% vs 4.40% for KMLM. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, KMLM has been the lower-risk option at 4.27%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.33% return vs 4.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for KMLM.

KMLM has the higher dividend yield at 4.57%, compared with 2.81% for AVDV.

AVDV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while KMLM is Long-Short. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVDV and 0.90% for KMLM.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVDV and KMLM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer