PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVDV vs. CTA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AVDV vs. CTA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVDV achieves a 13.22% return, which is significantly higher than CTA's 9.63% return.


AVDV

1D
0.26%
1M
-2.93%
YTD
13.22%
6M
16.29%
1Y
40.16%
3Y*
26.61%
5Y*
13.33%
10Y*

CTA

1D
0.52%
1M
-4.51%
YTD
9.63%
6M
12.55%
1Y
10.03%
3Y*
10.94%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVDV vs. CTA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
13.22%49.37%8.67%16.85%-1.62%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
9.63%0.88%24.15%-2.23%9.55%

Correlation

The correlation between AVDV and CTA is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2022

-0.15

The correlation between AVDV and CTA shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to -0.00 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

AVDV vs. CTA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AVDV
CTA

Basic Materials

22.5%

-

Industrials

21.3%

-

Consumer Cyclical

14.4%

-

Financial Services

13.7%
-49.1%

Energy

10.8%

-

Technology

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.4%

-

Healthcare

2.1%

-

Communication Services

2.0%

-

Utilities

1.7%

-

Real Estate

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

AVDV
22.5%
CTA

-

Industrials

AVDV
21.3%
CTA

-

Consumer Cyclical

AVDV
14.4%
CTA

-

Financial Services

AVDV
13.7%
CTA
-49.1%

Energy

AVDV
10.8%
CTA

-

Technology

AVDV
6.4%
CTA

-

Consumer Defensive

AVDV
3.4%
CTA

-

Healthcare

AVDV
2.1%
CTA

-

Communication Services

AVDV
2.0%
CTA

-

Utilities

AVDV
1.7%
CTA

-

Real Estate

AVDV
1.1%
CTA

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVDV vs. CTA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

CTA
CTA Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
CTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
CTA Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
CTA Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVDV vs. CTA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVDVCTADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.10

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.06

0.92

+2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.34

2.32

+10.02

AVDV vs. CTA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.54, which is higher than the CTA Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVDV and CTA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVDVCTADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.54

0.50

+2.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.58

+0.20

Drawdowns

AVDV vs. CTA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVDV drawdown since its inception was -43.01%, which is greater than CTA's maximum drawdown of -18.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDV and CTA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVDVCTADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.01%

-18.07%

-24.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.19%

-11.00%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.17%

-11.23%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.74%

-10.05%

+6.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.77%

-5.69%

-1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

4.33%

-1.07%

Volatility

AVDV vs. CTA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) is 5.49%, while Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF (CTA) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that AVDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CTA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVDVCTADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

6.73%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.49%

17.43%

-3.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

20.21%

-4.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

16.59%

+0.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.75%

16.59%

+3.16%

AVDV vs. CTA - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVDV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than CTA's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

AVDV vs. CTA - Dividend Comparison

AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.81%, less than CTA's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
2.81%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%
CTA
Simplify Managed Futures Strategy ETF
4.97%3.19%4.80%7.78%6.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AVDV and CTA have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CTA has higher volatility (6.73%) compared to AVDV (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDV dropped -43.01% vs CTA's -18.07%.

On 3-year performance, AVDV leads with 26.61% vs 10.94% for CTA. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 26.61% return vs 10.94%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for CTA.

CTA has the higher dividend yield at 4.97%, compared with 2.81% for AVDV.

AVDV is categorized as Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities, while CTA is Systematic Trend. They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVDV and 0.78% for CTA.

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVDV and CTA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer