AVDV vs. CGV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) and CGV (Conductor Global Equity Value ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, AVDV returned 28.01%/yr vs 12.42%/yr for CGV. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVDV charges 0.36%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for CGV.

Performance

AVDV vs. CGV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVDV achieves a 16.04% return, which is significantly higher than CGV's 12.00% return.

AVDV

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 3.98%
• YTD: 16.04%
• 6M: 19.54%
• 1Y: 44.23%
• 3Y*: 28.01%
• 5Y*: 13.72%
• 10Y*: —

CGV

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -0.01%
• YTD: 12.00%
• 6M: 14.03%
• 1Y: 27.77%
• 3Y*: 12.42%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVDV vs. CGV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF	16.04%	49.37%	8.67%	16.85%	0.22%
CGV Conductor Global Equity Value ETF	12.00%	23.11%	-3.34%	5.72%	3.44%

Correlation

The correlation between AVDV and CGV is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2022	0.84

The correlation between AVDV and CGV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

AVDV vs. CGV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	AVDV	CGV
Basic Materials	22.5%	21.1%
Industrials	21.3%	14.9%
Consumer Cyclical	14.4%	10.1%
Financial Services	13.7%	4.9%
Energy	10.8%	12.7%
Technology	6.4%	9.3%
Consumer Defensive	3.4%	14.3%
Healthcare	2.1%	5.3%
Communication Services	2.0%	2.2%
Utilities	1.7%	3.9%
Real Estate	1.1%	1.3%

Return for Risk

AVDV vs. CGV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVDV

AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 78
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 84
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 72

CGV

CGV Risk / Return Rank: 54
CGV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
CGV Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
CGV Omega Ratio Rank: 58
CGV Calmar Ratio Rank: 47
CGV Martin Ratio Rank: 50

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVDV vs. CGV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) and Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AVDV	CGV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.86	1.98	+0.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.79	2.65	+1.15
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.35	+0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.37	2.30	+1.07
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	13.67	8.42	+5.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AVDV vs. CGV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.86, which is higher than the CGV Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVDV and CGV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AVDV	CGV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.86	1.98	+0.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.80	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	0.77	+0.03

Drawdowns

AVDV vs. CGV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVDV drawdown since its inception was -43.01%, which is greater than CGV's maximum drawdown of -16.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVDV and CGV.

Drawdown Indicators

	AVDV	CGV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.01%	-16.64%	-26.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.19%	-12.13%	-1.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.17%	-16.64%	+2.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.08%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.35%	-3.75%	+2.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.77%	-3.65%	-3.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.24%	3.31%	-0.07%

Volatility

AVDV vs. CGV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) is 4.92%, while Conductor Global Equity Value ETF (CGV) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that AVDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AVDV	CGV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.92%	5.19%	-0.27%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.07%	11.66%	+1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.56%	14.08%	+1.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.30%	13.53%	+3.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.73%	13.53%	+6.20%

AVDV vs. CGV - Expense Ratio Comparison

AVDV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than CGV's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

AVDV vs. CGV - Dividend Comparison

AVDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.74%, less than CGV's 4.90% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF	2.74%	3.05%	4.31%	3.29%	3.17%	2.39%	1.67%	0.36%
CGV Conductor Global Equity Value ETF	4.90%	4.58%	2.87%	4.56%	0.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AVDV and CGV in my portfolio?

AVDV and CGV have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AVDV or CGV?

CGV has higher volatility (5.19%) compared to AVDV (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVDV dropped -43.01% vs CGV's -16.64%.

Which ETF is better, AVDV or CGV?

On 3-year performance, AVDV leads with 28.01% vs 12.42% for CGV. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, AVDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AVDV or CGV?

Over the 3-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 28.01% return vs 12.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AVDV or CGV?

AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 1.25% for CGV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AVDV or CGV?

CGV has the higher dividend yield at 4.90%, compared with 2.74% for AVDV.

What is the main difference between AVDV and CGV?

They also come from different issuers: Avantis and Conductor Fund. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for AVDV and 1.25% for CGV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.86 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.