PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVAV vs. META
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVAV vs. META - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVAV achieves a -41.05% return, which is significantly lower than META's -1.98% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with AVAV having a 17.89% annualized return and META not far ahead at 18.34%.


AVAV

1D
0.28%
1M
-15.92%
6M
-63.70%
YTD
-41.05%
1Y
-47.96%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*
17.89%
ALL TIME*
9.35%

META

1D
-0.02%
1M
11.89%
6M
4.31%
YTD
-1.98%
1Y
-8.00%
3Y*
30.34%
5Y*
13.48%
10Y*
18.34%
ALL TIME*
21.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVAV vs. META - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
-41.05%57.18%22.10%47.14%38.09%-28.62%40.75%-9.14%20.99%109.32%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
-1.98%13.09%66.05%194.13%-64.22%23.13%33.09%56.57%-25.71%53.38%

Correlation

The correlation between AVAV and META is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2012

0.26

The correlation between AVAV and META shifts across timeframes, from 0.11 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVAV:

$7.22B

META:

$1.64T

EPS

AVAV:

-$5.41

META:

$27.47

PS Ratio

AVAV:

4.93

META:

7.72

PB Ratio

AVAV:

1.64

META:

6.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVAV:

$1.42B

META:

$214.96B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVAV:

$246.70M

META:

$176.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

AVAV:

-$6.04M

META:

$106.31B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVAV vs. META — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVAV
AVAV Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
AVAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVAV Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
AVAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVAV Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

META
META Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
META Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
META Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
META Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
META Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
META Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVAV vs. META - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) and Meta Platforms, Inc. (META). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVAVMETADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.91

1.00

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.72

-0.24

-0.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.22

-0.45

-0.77

AVAV vs. META - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVAV Sharpe Ratio is -0.66, which is lower than the META Sharpe Ratio of -0.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVAV and META, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVAV vs. META - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVAV drawdown since its inception was -66.65%, smaller than the maximum META drawdown of -76.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVAV and META.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVAVMETADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.65%

-76.74%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.65%

-33.30%

-33.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.65%

-34.15%

-32.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.65%

-76.74%

+10.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.65%

-76.74%

+10.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-65.21%

-17.98%

-47.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.88%

-15.88%

-13.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

39.22%

17.63%

+21.59%

Volatility

AVAV vs. META - Volatility Comparison

AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has a higher volatility of 29.43% compared to Meta Platforms, Inc. (META) at 14.95%. This indicates that AVAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than META based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVAVMETADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

29.43%

14.95%

+14.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

60.09%

31.08%

+29.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.41%

38.77%

+34.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.39%

44.59%

+12.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.82%

39.00%

+13.82%

Dividends

AVAV vs. META - Dividend Comparison

AVAV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while META's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.33%.


PositionTTM20252024
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
META
Meta Platforms, Inc.
0.33%0.32%0.34%

Financials

AVAV vs. META - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AeroVironment, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B50.00B60.00B20222023202420252026
80.12M
56.31B
(AVAV) Total Revenue
(META) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AVAV vs. META - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between AeroVironment, Inc. and Meta Platforms, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
81.9%
Portfolio components
AVAV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 80.12M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

META - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a gross profit of 46.09B and revenue of 56.31B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.9%.

AVAV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported an operating income of 56.94M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in an operating margin of 71.1%.

META - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported an operating income of 22.87B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in an operating margin of 40.6%.

AVAV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AeroVironment, Inc. reported a net income of -24.10M and revenue of 80.12M, resulting in a net margin of -30.1%.

META - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Meta Platforms, Inc. reported a net income of 26.77B and revenue of 56.31B, resulting in a net margin of 47.5%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVAV and META have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVAV has higher volatility (29.43%) compared to META (14.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVAV dropped -66.65% vs META's -76.74%.

META currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.21 vs -0.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVAV and META

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer