PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVAV vs. CELH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVAV vs. CELH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVAV achieves a -23.65% return, which is significantly higher than CELH's -38.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AVAV has underperformed CELH with an annualized return of 19.16%, while CELH has yielded a comparatively higher 42.06% annualized return.


AVAV

1D
-0.67%
1M
9.74%
YTD
-23.65%
6M
-34.62%
1Y
-3.25%
3Y*
23.54%
5Y*
10.87%
10Y*
19.16%

CELH

1D
-0.46%
1M
-13.29%
YTD
-38.78%
6M
-36.79%
1Y
-31.03%
3Y*
-15.49%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
42.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVAV vs. CELH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AVAV
AeroVironment, Inc.
-23.65%57.18%22.10%47.14%38.09%-28.62%40.75%-9.14%20.99%109.32%
CELH
Celsius Holdings, Inc.
-38.78%73.65%-51.69%57.21%39.52%48.22%941.61%39.19%-33.90%114.29%

Correlation

The correlation between AVAV and CELH is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.21

The correlation between AVAV and CELH shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVAV:

$9.01B

CELH:

$7.27B

EPS

AVAV:

-$4.63

CELH:

$0.61

PS Ratio

AVAV:

7.51

CELH:

2.29

PB Ratio

AVAV:

2.11

CELH:

18.26

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVAV:

$1.19B

CELH:

$2.97B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVAV:

$104.63M

CELH:

$1.47B

EBITDA (TTM)

AVAV:

-$242.06M

CELH:

$274.27M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVAV vs. CELH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVAV
AVAV Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
AVAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVAV Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AVAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVAV Martin Ratio Rank: 4040
Martin Ratio Rank

CELH
CELH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CELH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CELH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
CELH Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CELH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CELH Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVAV vs. CELH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) and Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AVAVCELHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

0.94

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.05

-0.54

+0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.10

-1.06

+0.96

AVAV vs. CELH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVAV Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is higher than the CELH Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVAV and CELH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AVAVCELHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

-0.55

+0.51

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

0.04

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

0.62

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.64

-0.41

Drawdowns

AVAV vs. CELH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVAV drawdown since its inception was -61.45%, smaller than the maximum CELH drawdown of -77.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVAV and CELH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVAVCELHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.45%

-77.86%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-61.45%

-57.22%

-4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.45%

-77.86%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.45%

-77.86%

+16.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.45%

-77.86%

+16.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-54.94%

-70.87%

+15.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.56%

-27.86%

-0.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

33.68%

29.34%

+4.34%

Volatility

AVAV vs. CELH - Volatility Comparison

AeroVironment, Inc. (AVAV) has a higher volatility of 24.99% compared to Celsius Holdings, Inc. (CELH) at 18.92%. This indicates that AVAV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CELH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVAVCELHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

24.99%

18.92%

+6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

58.60%

37.51%

+21.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

73.83%

56.59%

+17.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.85%

65.66%

-9.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.96%

68.94%

-16.98%

Dividends

AVAV vs. CELH - Dividend Comparison

Neither AVAV nor CELH has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

AVAV vs. CELH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AeroVironment, Inc. and Celsius Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00M400.00M600.00M800.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
-10.80M
782.62M
(AVAV) Total Revenue
(CELH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


AVAV and CELH have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVAV has higher volatility (24.99%) compared to CELH (18.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVAV dropped -61.45% vs CELH's -77.86%.

AVAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.04 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVAV and CELH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer