AVAAX vs. FSMUX
AVAAX (AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio) and FSMUX (Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 3 years, AVAAX returned 3.81%/yr vs 3.86%/yr for FSMUX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. AVAAX charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for FSMUX.
Performance
AVAAX vs. FSMUX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AVAAX achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly higher than FSMUX's 1.47% return.
AVAAX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.75%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 1.78%
- 1Y
- 7.08%
- 3Y*
- 3.81%
- 5Y*
- 0.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.97%
FSMUX
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.90%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.83%
- 1Y
- 7.07%
- 3Y*
- 3.86%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVAAX vs. FSMUX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVAAX AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio | 1.60% | 4.95% | 1.50% | 5.23% | -9.38% | 0.62% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 1.47% | 3.14% | 2.99% | 6.78% | -11.25% | 0.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between AVAAX and FSMUX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 18, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between AVAAX and FSMUX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AVAAX vs. FSMUX — Risk / Return Rank
AVAAX
FSMUX
AVAAX vs. FSMUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio (AVAAX) and Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AVAAX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.71 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 3.15 | -0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.23 | 11.49 | -3.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AVAAX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.63 | 2.69 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.21 | 0.11 | +1.09 |
Drawdowns
AVAAX vs. FSMUX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AVAAX drawdown since its inception was -14.11%, smaller than the maximum FSMUX drawdown of -16.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVAAX and FSMUX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AVAAX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.11% | -16.27% | +2.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.91% | -2.68% | -0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.83% | -5.95% | +0.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.11% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.11% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.76% | -5.46% | +3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | 1.83% | -0.98% |
Volatility
AVAAX vs. FSMUX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio (AVAAX) is 1.10%, while Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund (FSMUX) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that AVAAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSMUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AVAAX | FSMUX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.10% | 1.21% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.07% | 2.10% | -0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.68% | 3.16% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.92% | 4.64% | -0.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.77% | 4.64% | -0.87% |
AVAAX vs. FSMUX - Expense Ratio Comparison
AVAAX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMUX's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
AVAAX vs. FSMUX - Dividend Comparison
AVAAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, more than FSMUX's 2.99% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVAAX AB Municipal Income Fund II Virginia Portfolio | 3.12% | 4.10% | 2.83% | 2.36% | 2.21% | 1.67% | 2.35% | 2.94% | 3.11% | 2.98% | 3.10% | 3.16% |
FSMUX Strategic Advisers Municipal Bond Fund | 2.99% | 3.26% | 3.74% | 3.18% | 2.14% | 0.99% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AVAAX and FSMUX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FSMUX has higher volatility (1.21%) compared to AVAAX (1.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVAAX dropped -14.11% vs FSMUX's -16.27%.
FSMUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 2.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AVAAX and FSMUX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer