PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUXFX vs. CSVZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUXFX vs. CSVZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUXFX achieves a 6.76% return, which is significantly lower than CSVZX's 13.56% return. Over the past 10 years, AUXFX has underperformed CSVZX with an annualized return of 9.95%, while CSVZX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.37% annualized return.


AUXFX

1D
0.14%
1M
0.99%
YTD
6.76%
6M
8.10%
1Y
16.79%
3Y*
13.62%
5Y*
8.56%
10Y*
9.95%

CSVZX

1D
0.74%
1M
5.28%
YTD
13.56%
6M
17.04%
1Y
37.24%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
13.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUXFX vs. CSVZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AUXFX
Auxier Focus Fund
6.76%15.23%11.31%9.76%-4.52%20.03%6.04%20.20%-4.13%17.75%
CSVZX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class
13.56%27.92%12.82%5.78%-0.84%26.61%6.43%26.89%-12.12%19.05%

Correlation

The correlation between AUXFX and CSVZX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2011

0.89

The correlation between AUXFX and CSVZX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUXFX vs. CSVZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUXFX
AUXFX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
AUXFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUXFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUXFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
AUXFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUXFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

CSVZX
CSVZX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CSVZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSVZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSVZX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
CSVZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSVZX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUXFX vs. CSVZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX) and Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUXFXCSVZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.57

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.13

4.24

-1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

17.44

-6.08

AUXFX vs. CSVZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUXFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the CSVZX Sharpe Ratio of 3.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUXFX and CSVZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUXFXCSVZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.98

3.25

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.74

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

0.72

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.67

-0.09

Drawdowns

AUXFX vs. CSVZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUXFX drawdown since its inception was -39.82%, roughly equal to the maximum CSVZX drawdown of -41.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUXFX and CSVZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUXFXCSVZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.82%

-41.46%

+1.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-9.00%

+3.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.30%

-14.76%

+5.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.73%

-18.36%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

-41.46%

+7.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

0.00%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.42%

-4.76%

+0.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.49%

2.19%

-0.70%

Volatility

AUXFX vs. CSVZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Auxier Focus Fund (AUXFX) is 2.27%, while Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class (CSVZX) has a volatility of 3.25%. This indicates that AUXFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSVZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUXFXCSVZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

3.25%

-0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.15%

8.81%

-2.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.57%

11.77%

-3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.17%

15.90%

-3.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.19%

18.69%

-3.50%

AUXFX vs. CSVZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUXFX has a 0.92% expense ratio, which is higher than CSVZX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUXFX vs. CSVZX - Dividend Comparison

AUXFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.66%, less than CSVZX's 7.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUXFX
Auxier Focus Fund
2.66%2.84%3.41%4.38%3.02%2.49%2.36%6.03%6.82%5.52%2.77%5.76%
CSVZX
Columbia Select Large Cap Value Fund Institutional Class
7.32%8.31%3.54%3.67%1.56%5.89%7.41%6.92%4.95%3.73%6.95%4.61%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUXFX and CSVZX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSVZX has higher volatility (3.25%) compared to AUXFX (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUXFX dropped -39.82% vs CSVZX's -41.46%.

CSVZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.25 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUXFX and CSVZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer