AURU vs. IFED
AURU (Tradr 2X Long AUR Daily ETF) and IFED (ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN) are both Leveraged Equities funds. AURU is actively managed, while IFED is passively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. AURU charges 1.30%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for IFED.
Performance
AURU vs. IFED - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
AURU
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IFED
- 1D
- -1.24%
- 1M
- 4.85%
- YTD
- -3.52%
- 6M
- -3.51%
- 1Y
- 1.97%
- 3Y*
- 16.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AURU vs. IFED - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
AURU Tradr 2X Long AUR Daily ETF | 9.13% | -59.96% |
IFED ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN | -3.52% | -0.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between AURU and IFED is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2025 | 0.32 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AURU vs. IFED — Risk / Return Rank
AURU
IFED
AURU vs. IFED - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long AUR Daily ETF (AURU) and ETRACS IFED Invest with the Fed TR Index ETN (IFED). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AURU | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.65 | — |
Drawdowns
AURU vs. IFED - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AURU | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -22.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -5.50% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -5.84% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.75% | — |
Volatility
AURU vs. IFED - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AURU | IFED | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.50% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 16.21% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 19.88% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 19.88% | — |
AURU vs. IFED - Expense Ratio Comparison
AURU has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than IFED's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
AURU vs. IFED - Dividend Comparison
Neither AURU nor IFED has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
AURU and IFED have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IFED is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IFED is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for AURU.
AURU and IFED have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and UBS. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for AURU and 0.45% for IFED.
Find the right allocation for AURU and IFED
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer