PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AULDX vs. FOCKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AULDX vs. FOCKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in American Century Ultra Fund Class R6 (AULDX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AULDX achieves a 1.71% return, which is significantly lower than FOCKX's 22.85% return. Over the past 10 years, AULDX has underperformed FOCKX with an annualized return of 18.22%, while FOCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 23.04% annualized return.


AULDX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-5.81%
YTD
1.71%
6M
0.16%
1Y
14.05%
3Y*
18.51%
5Y*
10.07%
10Y*
18.22%

FOCKX

1D
-0.39%
1M
-1.63%
YTD
22.85%
6M
21.87%
1Y
48.80%
3Y*
32.73%
5Y*
17.27%
10Y*
23.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AULDX vs. FOCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AULDX
American Century Ultra Fund Class R6
1.71%13.05%29.99%43.86%-32.15%23.89%50.31%35.23%1.04%32.36%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
22.85%22.28%38.91%42.92%-32.07%25.06%46.83%39.36%-3.18%38.78%

Correlation

The correlation between AULDX and FOCKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.95

The correlation between AULDX and FOCKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AULDX vs. FOCKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AULDX
AULDX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
AULDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AULDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
AULDX Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
AULDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
AULDX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FOCKX
FOCKX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FOCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FOCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AULDX vs. FOCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century Ultra Fund Class R6 (AULDX) and Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AULDXFOCKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.43

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.94

4.45

-3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.18

18.55

-15.38

AULDX vs. FOCKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AULDX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the FOCKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AULDX and FOCKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AULDX vs. FOCKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AULDX drawdown since its inception was -35.03%, smaller than the maximum FOCKX drawdown of -53.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AULDX and FOCKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AULDXFOCKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.03%

-53.33%

+18.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.60%

-11.28%

-4.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.78%

-24.83%

+0.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.03%

-36.97%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.03%

-36.97%

+1.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.75%

-5.28%

-2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.18%

-8.36%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.61%

2.69%

+1.92%

Volatility

AULDX vs. FOCKX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for American Century Ultra Fund Class R6 (AULDX) is 6.77%, while Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K (FOCKX) has a volatility of 9.54%. This indicates that AULDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FOCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AULDXFOCKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.77%

9.54%

-2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.52%

16.12%

-2.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.33%

19.82%

-2.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.72%

23.01%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

22.57%

-0.44%

AULDX vs. FOCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

AULDX has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than FOCKX's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

AULDX vs. FOCKX - Dividend Comparison

AULDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.42%, more than FOCKX's 6.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AULDX
American Century Ultra Fund Class R6
10.42%10.60%3.32%5.68%6.97%6.42%2.67%4.18%7.94%6.19%4.45%5.06%
FOCKX
Fidelity OTC Portfolio Class K
6.15%7.56%16.42%0.09%3.97%11.34%6.18%7.49%7.81%4.85%3.25%5.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, AULDX and FOCKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FOCKX has higher volatility (9.54%) compared to AULDX (6.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AULDX dropped -35.03% vs FOCKX's -53.33%.

FOCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AULDX and FOCKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer