AUGW vs. IWMY

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

AUGW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF) and IWMY (Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF) are both Options Trading funds. AUGW is actively managed, while IWMY is passively managed. Over the past year, AUGW returned 13.10% vs 24.81% for IWMY. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUGW charges 0.74%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for IWMY.

Performance

AUGW vs. IWMY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF (AUGW) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGW achieves a 4.26% return, which is significantly lower than IWMY's 13.83% return.

AUGW

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.25%
• YTD: 4.26%
• 6M: 4.69%
• 1Y: 13.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWMY

• 1D: 1.41%
• 1M: 2.87%
• YTD: 13.83%
• 6M: 12.08%
• 1Y: 24.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUGW vs. IWMY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
AUGW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF	4.26%	11.19%	13.19%	7.48%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	13.83%	10.18%	5.56%	9.74%

Correlation

The correlation between AUGW and IWMY is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2023	0.68

The correlation between AUGW and IWMY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

AUGW vs. IWMY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUGW

AUGW Risk / Return Rank: 88
AUGW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
AUGW Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
AUGW Omega Ratio Rank: 91
AUGW Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
AUGW Martin Ratio Rank: 92

IWMY

IWMY Risk / Return Rank: 44
IWMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
IWMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
IWMY Omega Ratio Rank: 43
IWMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
IWMY Martin Ratio Rank: 44

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUGW vs. IWMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF (AUGW) and Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	AUGW	IWMY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.81	1.58	+1.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.24	2.13	+2.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.27	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.11	2.15	+1.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.30	7.08	+15.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

AUGW vs. IWMY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGW Sharpe Ratio is 2.81, which is higher than the IWMY Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGW and IWMY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	AUGW	IWMY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.81	1.58	+1.22
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.68	0.99	+0.69

Drawdowns

AUGW vs. IWMY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGW drawdown since its inception was -8.76%, smaller than the maximum IWMY drawdown of -18.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGW and IWMY.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUGW	IWMY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.76%	-18.72%	+9.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.20%	-11.57%	+8.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.74%	-2.98%	+2.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.59%	3.51%	-2.92%

Volatility

AUGW vs. IWMY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF (AUGW) is 0.45%, while Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF (IWMY) has a volatility of 5.37%. This indicates that AUGW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWMY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUGW	IWMY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	5.37%	-4.92%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.41%	12.69%	-9.28%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.69%	15.74%	-11.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.76%	15.76%	-9.00%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.76%	15.76%	-9.00%

AUGW vs. IWMY - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUGW has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than IWMY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

AUGW vs. IWMY - Dividend Comparison

AUGW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IWMY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
AUGW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Aug ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWMY Defiance R2000 Enhanced Options & 0DTE Income ETF	46.16%	63.33%	107.92%	11.34%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUGW and IWMY in my portfolio?

AUGW and IWMY have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AUGW or IWMY?

IWMY has higher volatility (5.37%) compared to AUGW (0.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGW dropped -8.76% vs IWMY's -18.72%.

Which ETF is better, AUGW or IWMY?

On 1-year performance, IWMY leads with 24.81% vs 13.10% for AUGW. On fees, AUGW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, AUGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, AUGW or IWMY?

Over the 1-year period, IWMY has performed better with a 24.81% return vs 13.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, AUGW or IWMY?

AUGW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for IWMY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, AUGW or IWMY?

IWMY has the higher dividend yield at 46.16%, compared with 0.00% for AUGW.

What is the main difference between AUGW and IWMY?

They also come from different issuers: Allianz and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.74% for AUGW and 0.99% for IWMY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.81 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.