AUGU vs. NVBT
AUGU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF) and NVBT (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AUGU returned 20.22% vs 18.19% for NVBT. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.
Performance
AUGU vs. NVBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with AUGU having a 7.16% return and NVBT slightly lower at 7.15%.
AUGU
- 1D
- -0.50%
- 1M
- -0.26%
- YTD
- 7.16%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 20.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVBT
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 7.15%
- 6M
- 6.95%
- 1Y
- 18.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUGU vs. NVBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AUGU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF | 7.16% | 12.54% | 4.16% |
NVBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF | 7.15% | 12.84% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUGU and NVBT is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between AUGU and NVBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUGU vs. NVBT — Risk / Return Rank
AUGU
NVBT
AUGU vs. NVBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF (AUGU) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AUGU | NVBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.44 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 2.94 | +0.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.86 | 14.33 | -2.48 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AUGU vs. NVBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUGU drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum NVBT drawdown of -12.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGU and NVBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUGU | NVBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -12.90% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.72% | -6.21% | -0.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.97% | -0.68% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.84% | -1.35% | -0.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 1.27% | +0.44% |
Volatility
AUGU vs. NVBT - Volatility Comparison
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF (AUGU) has a higher volatility of 4.35% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Nov ETF (NVBT) at 2.77%. This indicates that AUGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUGU | NVBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.35% | 2.77% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.97% | 6.72% | +1.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.07% | 8.10% | +1.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 10.36% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.36% | 10.36% | +1.00% |
AUGU vs. NVBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AUGU and NVBT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Dividends
AUGU vs. NVBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUGU nor NVBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.96, AUGU and NVBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AUGU has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to NVBT (2.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGU dropped -12.17% vs NVBT's -12.90%.
On 1-year performance, AUGU leads with 20.22% vs 18.19% for NVBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, NVBT has been the lower-risk option at 2.77%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AUGU has performed better with a 20.22% return vs 18.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUGU and NVBT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.
AUGU and NVBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
NVBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUGU and NVBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer