AUGU vs. FEBT
AUGU (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF) and FEBT (Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF) are both Options Trading funds from Allianz. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, AUGU returned 21.60% vs 20.34% for FEBT. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.74% expense ratio.
Performance
AUGU vs. FEBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUGU achieves a 8.60% return, which is significantly higher than FEBT's 7.90% return.
AUGU
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 4.64%
- YTD
- 8.60%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FEBT
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 8.78%
- 1Y
- 20.34%
- 3Y*
- 16.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AUGU vs. FEBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
AUGU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF | 8.60% | 12.54% | 5.68% |
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF | 7.90% | 12.72% | 5.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUGU and FEBT is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2024 | 0.93 |
The correlation between AUGU and FEBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUGU vs. FEBT — Risk / Return Rank
AUGU
FEBT
AUGU vs. FEBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF (AUGU) and Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUGU | FEBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.52 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 3.38 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.29 | 17.26 | -3.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUGU | FEBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.32 | 2.67 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.36 | 1.64 | -0.28 |
Drawdowns
AUGU vs. FEBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUGU drawdown since its inception was -12.17%, smaller than the maximum FEBT drawdown of -13.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGU and FEBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUGU | FEBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.17% | -13.19% | +1.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.72% | -6.04% | -0.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.65% | -0.34% | -0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.80% | -1.18% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.63% | 1.18% | +0.45% |
Volatility
AUGU vs. FEBT - Volatility Comparison
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF (AUGU) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF (FEBT) at 1.28%. This indicates that AUGU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUGU | FEBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 1.28% | +1.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.02% | 5.98% | +1.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.36% | 7.67% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 9.75% | +1.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.06% | 9.75% | +1.31% |
AUGU vs. FEBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both AUGU and FEBT have an expense ratio of 0.74%.
Dividends
AUGU vs. FEBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither AUGU nor FEBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AUGU AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Aug ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FEBT Allianzim U.S. Large Cap Buffer10 Feb ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, AUGU and FEBT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
AUGU has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to FEBT (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGU dropped -12.17% vs FEBT's -13.19%.
On 1-year performance, AUGU leads with 21.60% vs 20.34% for FEBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.74% expense ratio. On volatility, FEBT has been the lower-risk option at 1.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AUGU has performed better with a 21.60% return vs 20.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AUGU and FEBT have the same expense ratio: 0.74% per year.
AUGU and FEBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FEBT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AUGU and FEBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer