AUGO vs. MLEC

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

AUGO (Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares) and MLEC (Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares) are both stocks. AUGO operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while MLEC operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare). Over the past year, AUGO returned 134.38% vs -85.98% for MLEC. Their 0.01 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.

Performance

AUGO vs. MLEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO) and Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares (MLEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUGO achieves a 10.23% return, which is significantly lower than MLEC's 76.22% return.

AUGO

• 1D: -4.18%
• 1M: -16.64%
• 6M: -12.75%
• YTD: 10.23%
• 1Y: 134.38%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 125.15%

MLEC

• 1D: -6.53%
• 1M: -15.51%
• 6M: 3.54%
• YTD: 76.22%
• 1Y: -85.98%
• 3Y*: -75.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -77.98%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares	$35.08M	$50.97M	$65.65M
MLEC Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares	$174.36K	$98.17K	$179.39K

AUGO vs. MLEC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares	10.23%	111.07%
MLEC Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares	76.22%	-94.47%

Correlation

The correlation between AUGO and MLEC is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.02
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2025	0.01

Fundamentals

Market Cap AUGO : $4.57B MLEC : $4.89M
Total Revenue (TTM) AUGO : $1.14B MLEC : $7.83M
Gross Profit (TTM) AUGO : $644.49M MLEC : -$639.50K
EBITDA (TTM) AUGO : $394.37M MLEC : -$5.21M

Return for Risk

AUGO vs. MLEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

AUGO

AUGO Risk / Return Rank: 85
AUGO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
AUGO Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
AUGO Omega Ratio Rank: 83
AUGO Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
AUGO Martin Ratio Rank: 83

MLEC

MLEC Risk / Return Rank: 21
MLEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
MLEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
MLEC Omega Ratio Rank: 27
MLEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
MLEC Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

AUGO vs. MLEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO) and Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares (MLEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	AUGO	MLEC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	-0.42	+2.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.28	-0.28	+2.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	0.97	+0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	-0.93	+3.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.15	-1.09	+7.24

AUGO vs. MLEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUGO Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the MLEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUGO and MLEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

AUGO vs. MLEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUGO drawdown since its inception was -53.65%, smaller than the maximum MLEC drawdown of -99.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUGO and MLEC.

Drawdown Indicators

	AUGO	MLEC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.65%	-99.88%	+46.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-53.65%	-92.98%	+39.33%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-99.32%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-49.48%	-99.77%	+50.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.88%	-92.00%	+78.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	21.85%	78.66%	-56.81%

Volatility

AUGO vs. MLEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO) is 25.65%, while Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares (MLEC) has a volatility of 31.84%. This indicates that AUGO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	AUGO	MLEC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.65%	31.84%	-6.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	59.99%	119.23%	-59.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.43%	207.10%	-136.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	69.38%	194.74%	-125.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	69.38%	194.74%	-125.36%

Dividends

AUGO vs. MLEC - Dividend Comparison

AUGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, while MLEC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares	4.12%	1.61%
MLEC Moolec Science SA Ordinary Shares	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both AUGO and MLEC in my portfolio?

AUGO and MLEC have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, AUGO or MLEC?

MLEC has higher volatility (31.84%) compared to AUGO (25.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AUGO dropped -53.65% vs MLEC's -99.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

AUGO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.