PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUCO.L vs. PME.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUCO.L vs. PME.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

AUCO.L is traded in USD, while PME.AX is traded in AUD. To make them comparable, the PME.AX values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUCO.L achieves a -8.56% return, which is significantly higher than PME.AX's -20.67% return. Over the past 10 years, AUCO.L has underperformed PME.AX with an annualized return of 14.35%, while PME.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 42.84% annualized return.


AUCO.L

1D
-1.44%
1M
-16.15%
YTD
-8.56%
6M
-1.88%
1Y
54.19%
3Y*
46.28%
5Y*
20.71%
10Y*
14.35%

PME.AX

1D
0.00%
1M
24.31%
YTD
-20.67%
6M
-28.44%
1Y
-34.65%
3Y*
40.43%
5Y*
25.17%
10Y*
42.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUCO.L vs. PME.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AUCO.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
-8.56%181.83%17.96%15.02%-14.30%-10.12%21.72%44.14%-10.42%10.00%
PME.AX
Pro Medicus Limited
-20.67%-4.61%137.97%74.08%-16.69%73.09%68.64%105.30%13.34%98.48%

Correlation

The correlation between AUCO.L and PME.AX is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2008

0.13

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUCO.L vs. PME.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUCO.L
AUCO.L Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUCO.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

PME.AX
PME.AX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
PME.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PME.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
PME.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
PME.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
PME.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUCO.L vs. PME.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUCO.LPME.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

0.90

+0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

-0.52

+2.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.45

-0.92

+5.37

AUCO.L vs. PME.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUCO.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is higher than the PME.AX Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUCO.L and PME.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUCO.LPME.AXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

-0.65

+1.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.57

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.94

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.56

-0.36

Drawdowns

AUCO.L vs. PME.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUCO.L drawdown since its inception was -78.30%, smaller than the maximum PME.AX drawdown of -85.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUCO.L and PME.AX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUCO.LPME.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.30%

-85.69%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.80%

-64.55%

+32.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-31.80%

-64.55%

+32.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-48.62%

-64.55%

+15.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.47%

-66.87%

+12.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.80%

-45.69%

+13.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.79%

-28.99%

-11.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.15%

37.21%

-25.06%

Volatility

AUCO.L vs. PME.AX - Volatility Comparison

L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF (AUCO.L) and Pro Medicus Limited (PME.AX) have volatilities of 15.14% and 15.17%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUCO.LPME.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

15.17%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.64%

49.94%

-13.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.89%

52.13%

-6.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.20%

43.70%

-5.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.40%

45.03%

-9.63%

Dividends

AUCO.L vs. PME.AX - Dividend Comparison

AUCO.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PME.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUCO.L
L&G Gold Mining UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PME.AX
Pro Medicus Limited
0.37%0.25%0.16%0.31%0.40%0.24%0.35%0.31%0.55%0.46%0.62%0.60%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUCO.L and PME.AX have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUCO.L and PME.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer