AUAD.L vs. IAPD.L
AUAD.L (UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis) and IAPD.L (iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds - AUAD.L tracks the MSCI Australia NR USD while IAPD.L tracks the MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, AUAD.L returned 6.87%/yr vs 12.72%/yr for IAPD.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. AUAD.L charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for IAPD.L.
Performance
AUAD.L vs. IAPD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AUAD.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly lower than IAPD.L's 13.20% return.
AUAD.L
- 1D
- -0.77%
- 1M
- -2.34%
- YTD
- 10.41%
- 6M
- 11.27%
- 1Y
- 14.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.79%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- —
IAPD.L
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- 13.20%
- 6M
- 13.81%
- 1Y
- 40.68%
- 3Y*
- 20.42%
- 5Y*
- 12.72%
- 10Y*
- 9.65%
AUAD.L vs. IAPD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUAD.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis | 10.41% | 6.19% | 3.38% | 7.37% | 5.97% | 8.63% | 40.70% |
IAPD.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 13.20% | 22.91% | 9.51% | 8.99% | 11.40% | 6.82% | 21.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between AUAD.L and IAPD.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020 | 0.57 |
The correlation between AUAD.L and IAPD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (all time) to 0.72 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
AUAD.L vs. IAPD.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Healthcare
Energy
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Basic Materials
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Consumer Cyclical
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Real Estate
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Healthcare
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Energy
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Industrials
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Consumer Defensive
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Communication Services
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Utilities
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Technology
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AUAD.L vs. IAPD.L — Risk / Return Rank
AUAD.L
IAPD.L
AUAD.L vs. IAPD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) and iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| AUAD.L | IAPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.72 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.71 | -0.50 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | 6.04 | -4.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.87 | 20.30 | -15.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| AUAD.L | IAPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 3.89 | -2.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 | 1.02 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.56 | +0.42 |
Drawdowns
AUAD.L vs. IAPD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AUAD.L drawdown since its inception was -21.75%, smaller than the maximum IAPD.L drawdown of -52.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAD.L and IAPD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AUAD.L | IAPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.75% | -52.66% | +30.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.32% | -6.92% | -1.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.75% | -16.88% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.75% | -16.88% | -4.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -37.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.35% | -2.91% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.07% | -7.37% | +2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 2.06% | +1.06% |
Volatility
AUAD.L vs. IAPD.L - Volatility Comparison
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS (IAPD.L) at 3.49%. This indicates that AUAD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAPD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AUAD.L | IAPD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.54% | 3.49% | +1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.32% | 8.32% | +2.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.01% | 10.73% | +2.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.83% | 12.44% | +4.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 15.46% | +2.87% |
AUAD.L vs. IAPD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
AUAD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than IAPD.L's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
AUAD.L vs. IAPD.L - Dividend Comparison
AUAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, less than IAPD.L's 4.89% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AUAD.L UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis | 2.91% | 3.22% | 3.57% | 4.16% | 3.95% | 2.50% | 3.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IAPD.L iShares Asia Pacific Dividend UCITS | 4.89% | 5.67% | 6.72% | 7.29% | 8.34% | 7.53% | 4.77% | 7.26% | 7.70% | 6.15% | 5.60% | 8.10% |
Frequently Asked Questions
AUAD.L and IAPD.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AUAD.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AUAD.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for IAPD.L.
AUAD.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while IAPD.L tracks MSCI AC Asia Pacific NR USD. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AUAD.L and 0.59% for IAPD.L.
Find the right allocation for AUAD.L and IAPD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer