PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) and UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AUAD.L achieves a 10.41% return, which is significantly higher than EUFM.L's 6.74% return.


AUAD.L

1D
-0.77%
1M
0.41%
YTD
10.41%
6M
11.49%
1Y
15.16%
3Y*
9.79%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*

EUFM.L

1D
0.21%
1M
2.81%
YTD
6.74%
6M
8.89%
1Y
16.80%
3Y*
15.42%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
AUAD.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis
10.41%6.19%3.38%7.37%5.97%8.63%40.70%
EUFM.L
UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc
6.74%29.59%3.25%15.45%-7.82%13.50%29.59%

Correlation

The correlation between AUAD.L and EUFM.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2020

0.44

Over the past year, AUAD.L and EUFM.L have become more correlated (0.64) than their long-term average of 0.44, meaning their price movements have been converging.

AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
AUAD.L
EUFM.L

Financial Services

43.6%
26.7%

Basic Materials

23.0%
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

6.1%
6.6%

Real Estate

5.0%
1.6%

Healthcare

4.9%
4.3%

Energy

4.5%
3.7%

Industrials

4.5%
23.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
6.7%

Communication Services

2.0%
4.2%

Utilities

1.7%
9.5%

Technology

1.1%
8.5%

Financial Services

AUAD.L
43.6%
EUFM.L
26.7%

Basic Materials

AUAD.L
23.0%
EUFM.L
4.8%

Consumer Cyclical

AUAD.L
6.1%
EUFM.L
6.6%

Real Estate

AUAD.L
5.0%
EUFM.L
1.6%

Healthcare

AUAD.L
4.9%
EUFM.L
4.3%

Energy

AUAD.L
4.5%
EUFM.L
3.7%

Industrials

AUAD.L
4.5%
EUFM.L
23.5%

Consumer Defensive

AUAD.L
3.6%
EUFM.L
6.7%

Communication Services

AUAD.L
2.0%
EUFM.L
4.2%

Utilities

AUAD.L
1.7%
EUFM.L
9.5%

Technology

AUAD.L
1.1%
EUFM.L
8.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AUAD.L
AUAD.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
AUAD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUAD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EUFM.L
EUFM.L Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EUFM.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
EUFM.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) and UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AUAD.LEUFM.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.10

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.26

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

1.58

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.87

5.69

-0.82

AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AUAD.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the EUFM.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AUAD.L and EUFM.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AUAD.LEUFM.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.36

-0.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

0.67

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.97

0.53

+0.44

Drawdowns

AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AUAD.L drawdown since its inception was -21.75%, smaller than the maximum EUFM.L drawdown of -30.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AUAD.L and EUFM.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AUAD.LEUFM.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.75%

-30.14%

+8.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.32%

-10.59%

+2.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.75%

-11.90%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.75%

-20.86%

-0.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.35%

-1.07%

-2.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.07%

-5.19%

+0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.12%

2.95%

+0.17%

Volatility

AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L - Volatility Comparison

UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis (AUAD.L) has a higher volatility of 4.54% compared to UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc (EUFM.L) at 4.00%. This indicates that AUAD.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUFM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AUAD.LEUFM.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.54%

4.00%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

10.33%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.01%

12.33%

+0.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.83%

14.53%

+2.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

16.13%

+2.20%

AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

AUAD.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EUFM.L's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

AUAD.L vs. EUFM.L - Dividend Comparison

AUAD.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.91%, while EUFM.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
AUAD.L
UBS ETF (IE) MSCI Australia UCITS ETF (AUD) A-dis
2.91%3.22%3.57%4.16%3.95%2.50%3.10%
EUFM.L
UBS (Lux) Fund Solutions – MSCI EMU Select Factor Mix UCITS ETF(EUR)A-acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


AUAD.L and EUFM.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EUFM.L is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EUFM.L is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for AUAD.L.

AUAD.L is categorized as Asia Pacific Equities, while EUFM.L is Europe Equities. AUAD.L tracks MSCI Australia NR USD, while EUFM.L tracks MSCI EMU NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for AUAD.L and 0.34% for EUFM.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AUAD.L and EUFM.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer