AU vs. IAG
AU (AngloGold Ashanti Limited) and IAG (IAMGOLD Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Gold industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, AU returned 15.63%/yr vs 10.35%/yr for IAG. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
AU vs. IAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AU achieves a -4.27% return, which is significantly higher than IAG's -13.95% return. Over the past 10 years, AU has outperformed IAG with an annualized return of 15.63%, while IAG has yielded a comparatively lower 10.35% annualized return.
AU
- 1D
- -3.66%
- 1M
- -1.94%
- 6M
- -12.10%
- YTD
- -4.27%
- 1Y
- 80.98%
- 3Y*
- 63.56%
- 5Y*
- 35.23%
- 10Y*
- 15.63%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.86%
IAG
- 1D
- -2.54%
- 1M
- -10.02%
- 6M
- -21.95%
- YTD
- -13.95%
- 1Y
- 109.91%
- 3Y*
- 76.06%
- 5Y*
- 38.95%
- 10Y*
- 10.35%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.33%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $212.23M | $200.63M | $261.69M | |
| $76.33M | $73.71M | $89.43M |
AU vs. IAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited | -4.27% | 288.18% | 25.43% | -2.68% | -5.09% | -4.87% | 1.90% | 78.89% | 23.96% | -2.23% |
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | -13.95% | 219.57% | 103.95% | -1.94% | -17.57% | -14.71% | -1.61% | 1.36% | -36.88% | 51.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between AU and IAG is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.69 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2003 | 0.67 |
The correlation between AU and IAG shifts across timeframes, from 0.67 (all time) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
AU:
$40.12B
IAG:
$8.20B
AU:
$6.85
IAG:
$1.73
AU:
11.57
IAG:
8.22
AU:
0.13
IAG:
0.05
AU:
3.60
IAG:
2.43
AU:
4.69
IAG:
1.94
AU:
$11.17B
IAG:
$3.42B
AU:
$5.82B
IAG:
$1.64B
AU:
$5.58B
IAG:
$1.97B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
AU vs. IAG — Risk / Return Rank
AU
IAG
AU vs. IAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU) and IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| AU | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.29 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.04 | 2.55 | -0.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 5.35 | -0.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
AU vs. IAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AU drawdown since its inception was -90.12%, smaller than the maximum IAG drawdown of -95.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AU and IAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| AU | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.12% | -95.55% | +5.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -39.91% | -43.30% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -39.91% | -43.30% | +3.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.75% | -73.69% | +21.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.91% | -86.46% | +18.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.35% | -42.25% | +5.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -46.01% | -56.07% | +10.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.61% | 20.61% | -2.00% |
Volatility
AU vs. IAG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AngloGold Ashanti Limited (AU) is 13.39%, while IAMGOLD Corporation (IAG) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that AU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IAG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| AU | IAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.39% | 15.14% | -1.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.78% | 48.40% | -2.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.93% | 62.98% | -4.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.59% | 60.60% | -11.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.75% | 58.53% | -8.78% |
Dividends
AU vs. IAG - Dividend Comparison
AU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.80%, while IAG has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AU AngloGold Ashanti Limited | 5.80% | 2.96% | 1.78% | 1.14% | 2.26% | 2.58% | 0.49% | 0.30% | 0.48% | 0.93% |
IAG IAMGOLD Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
AU vs. IAG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AngloGold Ashanti Limited and IAMGOLD Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AU vs. IAG - Profitability Comparison
AU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported a gross profit of 1.88B and revenue of 3.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 58.2%.
IAG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a gross profit of 570.70M and revenue of 1.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.4%.
AU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported an operating income of 1.84B and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 56.8%.
IAG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported an operating income of 544.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 52.9%.
AU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, AngloGold Ashanti Limited reported a net income of 1.28B and revenue of 3.24B, resulting in a net margin of 39.6%.
IAG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, IAMGOLD Corporation reported a net income of 379.70M and revenue of 1.03B, resulting in a net margin of 36.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
AU and IAG have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IAG has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to AU (13.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AU dropped -90.12% vs IAG's -95.55%.
IAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for AU and IAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer