PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATT.L vs. RBTX.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATT.L vs. RBTX.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Allianz Technology Trust plc (ATT.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATT.L achieves a 41.56% return, which is significantly higher than RBTX.L's 29.04% return.


ATT.L

1D
-1.19%
1M
17.11%
YTD
41.56%
6M
43.46%
1Y
84.20%
3Y*
41.02%
5Y*
22.72%
10Y*
28.35%

RBTX.L

1D
-0.32%
1M
9.00%
YTD
29.04%
6M
26.25%
1Y
47.66%
3Y*
18.77%
5Y*
11.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATT.L vs. RBTX.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATT.L
Allianz Technology Trust plc
41.56%25.78%38.06%44.52%-40.43%18.69%80.33%35.00%4.36%42.69%
RBTX.L
iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF
29.04%9.17%7.51%32.05%-26.55%22.26%35.08%32.52%-13.97%34.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ATT.L and RBTX.L is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2016

0.72

The correlation between ATT.L and RBTX.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATT.L vs. RBTX.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATT.L
ATT.L Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ATT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ATT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

RBTX.L
RBTX.L Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
RBTX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATT.L vs. RBTX.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianz Technology Trust plc (ATT.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATT.LRBTX.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.39

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.27

3.62

+4.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.87

10.72

+15.15

ATT.L vs. RBTX.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATT.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.60, which is higher than the RBTX.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATT.L and RBTX.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATT.LRBTX.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.60

2.27

+1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.56

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

0.78

+0.15

Drawdowns

ATT.L vs. RBTX.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATT.L drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, which is greater than RBTX.L's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATT.L and RBTX.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATT.LRBTX.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.95%

-33.46%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.13%

-13.10%

+2.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.60%

-27.28%

-5.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.95%

-33.46%

-12.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.58%

-0.32%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.23%

-8.25%

-1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.24%

4.43%

-1.19%

Volatility

ATT.L vs. RBTX.L - Volatility Comparison

Allianz Technology Trust plc (ATT.L) and iShares Automation & Robotics UCITS ETF (RBTX.L) have volatilities of 7.17% and 7.01%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATT.LRBTX.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.17%

7.01%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.75%

16.35%

+0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.29%

20.86%

+2.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.55%

21.16%

+8.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.91%

20.70%

+9.21%

Dividends

ATT.L vs. RBTX.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATT.L nor RBTX.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ATT.L and RBTX.L have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATT.L and RBTX.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer