PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
ATT.L vs. PCT.L
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


ATT.LPCT.L
YTD Return27.84%26.97%
1Y Return45.59%43.57%
3Y Return (Ann)3.20%7.40%
5Y Return (Ann)19.56%17.73%
10Y Return (Ann)21.56%20.11%
Sharpe Ratio1.361.93
Sortino Ratio1.932.48
Omega Ratio1.271.33
Calmar Ratio1.642.04
Martin Ratio4.795.72
Ulcer Index8.90%7.24%
Daily Std Dev31.25%21.47%
Max Drawdown-45.95%-84.10%
Current Drawdown-5.48%-4.35%

Fundamentals


ATT.LPCT.L
Market Cap£1.46B£3.82B
EPS£1.32£0.90
PE Ratio2.893.58
PEG Ratio0.000.00
Total Revenue (TTM)£520.73M£804.99M
Gross Profit (TTM)£512.82M£790.64M
EBITDA (TTM)£511.67M-£6.12M

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.7

The correlation between ATT.L and PCT.L is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

ATT.L vs. PCT.L - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ATT.L having a 27.84% return and PCT.L slightly lower at 26.97%. Over the past 10 years, ATT.L has outperformed PCT.L with an annualized return of 21.56%, while PCT.L has yielded a comparatively lower 20.11% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.34%
13.89%
ATT.L
PCT.L

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

ATT.L vs. PCT.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allianz Technology Trust plc (ATT.L) and Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for ATT.L, currently valued at 1.61, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.61
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for ATT.L, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.19
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for ATT.L, currently valued at 1.31, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.31
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for ATT.L, currently valued at 1.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.001.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for ATT.L, currently valued at 6.15, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.006.15
PCT.L
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.23
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 2.81, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.81
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.38
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 2.17, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.17
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for PCT.L, currently valued at 7.29, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.007.29

ATT.L vs. PCT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATT.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is comparable to the PCT.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATT.L and PCT.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
1.61
2.23
ATT.L
PCT.L

Dividends

ATT.L vs. PCT.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATT.L nor PCT.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

ATT.L vs. PCT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATT.L drawdown since its inception was -45.95%, smaller than the maximum PCT.L drawdown of -84.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATT.L and PCT.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-4.35%
-3.80%
ATT.L
PCT.L

Volatility

ATT.L vs. PCT.L - Volatility Comparison

Allianz Technology Trust plc (ATT.L) has a higher volatility of 7.41% compared to Polar Capital Technology Trust (PCT.L) at 6.90%. This indicates that ATT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
7.41%
6.90%
ATT.L
PCT.L

Financials

ATT.L vs. PCT.L - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Allianz Technology Trust plc and Polar Capital Technology Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in GBp except per share items