ATSX.TO vs. ZEA.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ATSX.TO (Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund) and ZEA.TO (BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ATSX.TO is a fund fund, while ZEA.TO is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Index. Over the past 5 years, ATSX.TO returned 19.02%/yr vs 11.18%/yr for ZEA.TO. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ATSX.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund (ATSX.TO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATSX.TO achieves a 16.72% return, which is significantly higher than ZEA.TO's 10.79% return.

ATSX.TO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 16.72%
• 6M: 20.42%
• 1Y: 48.45%
• 3Y*: 29.23%
• 5Y*: 19.02%
• 10Y*: —

ZEA.TO

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: 4.84%
• YTD: 10.79%
• 6M: 10.55%
• 1Y: 22.50%
• 3Y*: 17.95%
• 5Y*: 11.18%
• 10Y*: 9.90%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATSX.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ATSX.TO Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund	16.72%	41.34%	21.66%	6.63%	2.11%	20.33%	2.68%	6.26%
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF	10.79%	24.28%	11.56%	16.02%	-8.51%	10.64%	5.13%	6.87%

Correlation

The correlation between ATSX.TO and ZEA.TO is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.10
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019	0.11

ATSX.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ATSX.TO	ZEA.TO
Basic Materials	23.7%	6.0%
Energy	22.3%	3.9%
Consumer Cyclical	14.0%	7.6%
Industrials	12.1%	20.0%
Consumer Defensive	11.7%	6.8%
Financial Services	11.6%	24.4%
Healthcare	2.3%	10.5%
Communication Services	2.3%	4.6%
Real Estate	-	1.9%
Technology	-	10.5%
Utilities	-	3.9%

Return for Risk

ATSX.TO vs. ZEA.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATSX.TO

ATSX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 86
ATSX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
ATSX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
ATSX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 85
ATSX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ATSX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 92

ZEA.TO

ZEA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 47
ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
ZEA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
ZEA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 49
ZEA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
ZEA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 49

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATSX.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund (ATSX.TO) and BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATSX.TO	ZEA.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	1.62	+1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	2.32	+1.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.30	+0.21
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.45	2.07	+3.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.23	8.07	+14.15
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ATSX.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATSX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the ZEA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATSX.TO and ZEA.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATSX.TO	ZEA.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	1.62	+1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.17	0.83	+0.34
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.67	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.79	0.60	+0.19

Drawdowns

ATSX.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATSX.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.95%, smaller than the maximum ZEA.TO drawdown of -27.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATSX.TO and ZEA.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATSX.TO	ZEA.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.95%	-27.80%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.93%	-10.91%	+1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.24%	-14.11%	+1.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.45%	-23.67%	+9.22%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-27.80%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	-1.43%	+1.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.24%	-4.63%	-0.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.19%	2.79%	-0.60%

Volatility

ATSX.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund (ATSX.TO) is 5.09%, while BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF (ZEA.TO) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that ATSX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZEA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATSX.TO	ZEA.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.09%	5.56%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.99%	11.70%	+3.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.08%	13.93%	+4.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.39%	13.51%	+2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.41%	14.92%	+5.49%

Dividends

ATSX.TO vs. ZEA.TO - Dividend Comparison

ATSX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ZEA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.92%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ATSX.TO Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund	0.00%	0.00%	1.56%	7.45%	7.37%	4.33%	1.92%	0.97%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ZEA.TO BMO MSCI EAFE Index ETF	1.92%	2.17%	2.77%	3.00%	3.06%	2.48%	2.72%	2.93%	3.03%	2.39%	2.78%	2.42%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATSX.TO and ZEA.TO in my portfolio?

ATSX.TO and ZEA.TO have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.