PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATSX.TO vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATSX.TO vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund (ATSX.TO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATSX.TO is traded in CAD, while SPYV is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPYV values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATSX.TO achieves a 16.83% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 8.83% return.


ATSX.TO

1D
2.13%
1M
4.46%
YTD
16.83%
6M
19.72%
1Y
48.73%
3Y*
30.29%
5Y*
19.04%
10Y*

SPYV

1D
0.05%
1M
4.26%
YTD
8.83%
6M
7.35%
1Y
22.83%
3Y*
17.07%
5Y*
13.85%
10Y*
12.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATSX.TO vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ATSX.TO
Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund
16.83%41.34%21.66%6.63%2.11%20.33%2.68%6.26%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
8.83%7.99%21.88%19.51%1.47%23.78%-0.33%11.49%

Correlation

The correlation between ATSX.TO and SPYV is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2019

0.09

The correlation between ATSX.TO and SPYV shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ATSX.TO vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ATSX.TO
SPYV

Basic Materials

23.7%
3.4%

Energy

22.3%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

14.0%
10.9%

Industrials

12.1%
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

11.7%
9.2%

Financial Services

11.6%
14.7%

Healthcare

2.3%
11.6%

Communication Services

2.3%
3.2%

Real Estate

-

3.3%

Technology

-

21.2%

Utilities

-

4.4%

Basic Materials

ATSX.TO
23.7%
SPYV
3.4%

Energy

ATSX.TO
22.3%
SPYV
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

ATSX.TO
14.0%
SPYV
10.9%

Industrials

ATSX.TO
12.1%
SPYV
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

ATSX.TO
11.7%
SPYV
9.2%

Financial Services

ATSX.TO
11.6%
SPYV
14.7%

Healthcare

ATSX.TO
2.3%
SPYV
11.6%

Communication Services

ATSX.TO
2.3%
SPYV
3.2%

Real Estate

ATSX.TO

-

SPYV
3.3%

Technology

ATSX.TO

-

SPYV
21.2%

Utilities

ATSX.TO

-

SPYV
4.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATSX.TO vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATSX.TO
ATSX.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
ATSX.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATSX.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATSX.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
ATSX.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATSX.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATSX.TO vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund (ATSX.TO) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATSX.TOSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.42

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.48

3.94

+1.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

22.33

15.52

+6.81

ATSX.TO vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATSX.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATSX.TO and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATSX.TOSPYVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71

2.28

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.17

1.11

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.99

-0.20

Drawdowns

ATSX.TO vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATSX.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.95%, smaller than the maximum SPYV drawdown of -30.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATSX.TO and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATSX.TOSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.95%

-30.96%

+5.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-5.81%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.24%

-15.98%

+3.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.45%

-15.98%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.19%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.25%

-3.08%

-2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.48%

+0.71%

Volatility

ATSX.TO vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund (ATSX.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.18% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.09%. This indicates that ATSX.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATSX.TOSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

2.09%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.07%

7.54%

+7.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.28%

10.08%

+8.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.39%

12.49%

+3.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.41%

15.19%

+5.22%

Dividends

ATSX.TO vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

ATSX.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATSX.TO
Accelerate Enhanced Canadian Benchmark Alternative Fund
0.00%0.00%1.56%7.45%7.37%4.33%1.92%0.97%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.70%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATSX.TO and SPYV have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATSX.TO and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer