ATSX.TO vs. CMAG.TO
ATSX.TO (Accelerate Canadian Long Short Equity Fund) and CMAG.TO (CI Munro Alternative Global Growth Fund) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ATSX.TO returned 20.94%/yr vs 10.22%/yr for CMAG.TO. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATSX.TO vs. CMAG.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATSX.TO achieves a 18.75% return, which is significantly higher than CMAG.TO's 9.85% return.
ATSX.TO
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 6.72%
- 6M
- 12.93%
- YTD
- 18.75%
- 1Y
- 46.57%
- 3Y*
- 27.95%
- 5Y*
- 20.94%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.46%
CMAG.TO
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -5.48%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- YTD
- 9.85%
- 1Y
- 14.04%
- 3Y*
- 22.44%
- 5Y*
- 10.22%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.10%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$18.98K | CA$15.39K | CA$14.63K | |
| CA$107.01K | CA$247.67K | CA$200.38K |
ATSX.TO vs. CMAG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATSX.TO Accelerate Canadian Long Short Equity Fund | 18.75% | 41.34% | 21.66% | 6.63% | 2.11% | 29.61% | 6.83% |
CMAG.TO CI Munro Alternative Global Growth Fund | 9.85% | 13.08% | 37.11% | 16.07% | -19.04% | 9.21% | 34.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATSX.TO and CMAG.TO is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2020 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATSX.TO vs. CMAG.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ATSX.TO
CMAG.TO
ATSX.TO vs. CMAG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Accelerate Canadian Long Short Equity Fund (ATSX.TO) and CI Munro Alternative Global Growth Fund (CMAG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATSX.TO | CMAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.27 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.13 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.29 | 1.22 | +4.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.93 | 3.13 | +16.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATSX.TO vs. CMAG.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATSX.TO drawdown since its inception was -25.95%, which is greater than CMAG.TO's maximum drawdown of -23.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATSX.TO and CMAG.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATSX.TO | CMAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.95% | -23.94% | -2.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.93% | -11.54% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.24% | -18.87% | +6.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.45% | -23.94% | +9.49% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.70% | -8.19% | +7.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.95% | -8.10% | +3.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 4.49% | -2.13% |
Volatility
ATSX.TO vs. CMAG.TO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Accelerate Canadian Long Short Equity Fund (ATSX.TO) is 4.19%, while CI Munro Alternative Global Growth Fund (CMAG.TO) has a volatility of 8.74%. This indicates that ATSX.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CMAG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATSX.TO | CMAG.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.19% | 8.74% | -4.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.37% | 18.53% | -3.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.63% | 21.31% | -2.68% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.72% | 17.32% | +0.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.20% | 17.25% | +3.95% |
Dividends
ATSX.TO vs. CMAG.TO - Dividend Comparison
Neither ATSX.TO nor CMAG.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATSX.TO Accelerate Canadian Long Short Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.56% | 7.45% | 7.37% | 11.77% | 5.79% | 3.60% |
CMAG.TO CI Munro Alternative Global Growth Fund | 0.00% | 0.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATSX.TO and CMAG.TO have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Accelerate Financial Technologies Inc. and CI.
Find the right allocation for ATSX.TO and CMAG.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer