ATS vs. AUGO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ATS (ATS Corporation) and AUGO (Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares) are both stocks. ATS operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while AUGO operates in Gold (Basic Materials). At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ATS vs. AUGO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ATS Corporation (ATS) and Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATS achieves a 4.76% return, which is significantly lower than AUGO's 29.74% return.

ATS

• 1D: -3.38%
• 1M: -10.15%
• YTD: 4.76%
• 6M: 12.48%
• 1Y: -2.99%
• 3Y*: -13.66%
• 5Y*: 2.54%
• 10Y*: 13.52%

AUGO

• 1D: -5.60%
• 1M: -20.56%
• YTD: 29.74%
• 6M: 56.63%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATS vs. AUGO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ATS ATS Corporation	4.76%	-8.87%
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares	29.74%	113.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ATS and AUGO is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2025	0.22

Fundamentals

EPS ATS : $0.97 AUGO : $1.10
PE Ratio ATS : 29.67 AUGO : 58.30
PS Ratio ATS : 0.71 AUGO : 4.54
Total Revenue (TTM) ATS : $2.97B AUGO : $1.14B
Gross Profit (TTM) ATS : $850.80M AUGO : $644.49M
EBITDA (TTM) ATS : $357.63M AUGO : $394.37M

Return for Risk

ATS vs. AUGO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATS

ATS Risk / Return Rank: 36
ATS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
ATS Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ATS Omega Ratio Rank: 34
ATS Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
ATS Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATS vs. AUGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATS Corporation (ATS) and Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares (AUGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ATS	AUGO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.07	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.18	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.12	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.23	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ATS	AUGO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.06	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.37	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	3.28	-2.93

Drawdowns

ATS vs. AUGO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATS drawdown since its inception was -56.76%, which is greater than AUGO's maximum drawdown of -40.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATS and AUGO.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATS	AUGO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.76%	-40.54%	-16.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.80%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-56.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.76%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.76%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-40.80%	-40.54%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.90%	-8.28%	-11.62%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ATS	AUGO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.42%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	32.82%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.56%	66.37%	-25.81%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	40.36%	66.37%	-26.01%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.64%	66.37%	-27.73%

Dividends

ATS vs. AUGO - Dividend Comparison

ATS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AUGO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%.

Position	TTM	2025
ATS ATS Corporation	0.00%	0.00%
AUGO Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares	3.50%	1.61%

Financials

ATS vs. AUGO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between ATS Corporation and Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

ATS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ATS Corporation reported a gross profit of 188.27M and revenue of 747.10M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.2%.

AUGO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported a gross profit of 193.50M and revenue of 382.61M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 50.6%.

ATS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ATS Corporation reported an operating income of 23.21M and revenue of 747.10M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.1%.

AUGO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported an operating income of 172.35M and revenue of 382.61M, resulting in an operating margin of 45.1%.

ATS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ATS Corporation reported a net income of -16.11M and revenue of 747.10M, resulting in a net margin of -2.2%.

AUGO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aura Minerals Inc. Common Shares reported a net income of 95.16M and revenue of 382.61M, resulting in a net margin of 24.9%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATS and AUGO in my portfolio?

ATS and AUGO have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.