PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATRFX vs. QRPRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATRFX vs. QRPRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) and AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATRFX achieves a -2.88% return, which is significantly lower than QRPRX's 22.10% return.


ATRFX

1D
0.87%
1M
-2.15%
6M
2.30%
YTD
-2.88%
1Y
9.45%
3Y*
-1.32%
5Y*
3.09%
10Y*
5.35%
ALL TIME*
4.55%

QRPRX

1D
0.18%
1M
5.64%
6M
16.93%
YTD
22.10%
1Y
37.43%
3Y*
22.90%
5Y*
19.99%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ATRFX vs. QRPRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ATRFX
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I
-2.88%2.81%-4.14%24.60%-4.33%25.70%15.32%29.25%-15.28%
QRPRX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6
22.10%23.57%18.88%7.30%25.46%14.33%-20.91%-2.94%-4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between ATRFX and QRPRX is 0.34, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2018

0.13

Over the past year, ATRFX and QRPRX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.13, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATRFX vs. QRPRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ATRFX
ATRFX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ATRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ATRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

QRPRX
QRPRX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
QRPRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRPRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRPRX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
QRPRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRPRX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ATRFX vs. QRPRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) and AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATRFXQRPRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.68

-0.60

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.37

10.19

-9.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.06

27.25

-26.19

ATRFX vs. QRPRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATRFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.39, which is lower than the QRPRX Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATRFX and QRPRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATRFX vs. QRPRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATRFX drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, which is greater than QRPRX's maximum drawdown of -28.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRFX and QRPRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATRFXQRPRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.17%

-28.21%

-6.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.53%

-3.51%

-19.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.17%

-11.24%

-23.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.17%

-11.24%

-23.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.16%

0.00%

-17.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-7.41%

-1.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.84%

1.31%

+6.53%

Volatility

ATRFX vs. QRPRX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6 (QRPRX) at 2.45%. This indicates that ATRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRPRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATRFXQRPRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

2.45%

+2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.52%

6.88%

+10.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.45%

9.42%

+12.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.32%

11.88%

+5.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.69%

10.36%

+5.33%

ATRFX vs. QRPRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATRFX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is lower than QRPRX's 4.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATRFX vs. QRPRX - Dividend Comparison

ATRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, less than QRPRX's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATRFX
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I
0.36%0.65%11.89%1.87%4.98%5.43%20.92%1.60%1.37%0.00%0.91%1.02%
QRPRX
AQR Alternative Risk Premia R6
1.23%1.51%2.33%4.60%0.00%4.16%1.97%1.00%0.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATRFX and QRPRX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATRFX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to QRPRX (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATRFX dropped -35.17% vs QRPRX's -28.21%.

QRPRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATRFX and QRPRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer