ATRFX vs. GAAVX
ATRFX (Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I) and GAAVX (GMO Alternative Allocation Fund) are both Multistrategy funds. Over the past 5 years, ATRFX returned 5.27%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for GAAVX. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ATRFX charges 1.77%/yr vs 0.61%/yr for GAAVX.
Performance
ATRFX vs. GAAVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATRFX achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than GAAVX's 1.26% return.
ATRFX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 9.53%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 16.49%
- 3Y*
- 0.36%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 5.84%
GAAVX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -0.22%
- YTD
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 3.25%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 5.68%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- —
ATRFX vs. GAAVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATRFX Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I | 0.09% | 2.81% | -4.14% | 24.60% | -4.33% | 25.70% | 15.32% | 17.47% |
GAAVX GMO Alternative Allocation Fund | 1.26% | 15.19% | -5.70% | 6.07% | 3.63% | -5.12% | -0.28% | 3.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATRFX and GAAVX is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2019 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATRFX vs. GAAVX — Risk / Return Rank
ATRFX
GAAVX
ATRFX vs. GAAVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) and GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATRFX | GAAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.42 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.76 | 4.20 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.26 | 11.83 | -9.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATRFX | GAAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 2.19 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 | 0.41 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.41 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
ATRFX vs. GAAVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATRFX drawdown since its inception was -35.17%, which is greater than GAAVX's maximum drawdown of -9.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATRFX and GAAVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATRFX | GAAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.17% | -9.59% | -25.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.53% | -3.39% | -19.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.17% | -7.73% | -27.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.17% | -9.59% | -25.58% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.17% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.63% | -3.18% | -11.45% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -3.08% | -5.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.61% | 1.20% | +6.41% |
Volatility
ATRFX vs. GAAVX - Volatility Comparison
Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I (ATRFX) has a higher volatility of 3.50% compared to GMO Alternative Allocation Fund (GAAVX) at 1.95%. This indicates that ATRFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GAAVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATRFX | GAAVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.50% | 1.95% | +1.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.55% | 4.92% | +12.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 6.51% | +13.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.35% | 5.88% | +11.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.54% | 5.90% | +9.64% |
ATRFX vs. GAAVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATRFX has a 1.77% expense ratio, which is higher than GAAVX's 0.61% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATRFX vs. GAAVX - Dividend Comparison
ATRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than GAAVX's 8.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATRFX Catalyst Systematic Alpha Class I | 0.49% | 0.65% | 11.89% | 1.87% | 4.98% | 5.43% | 20.92% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.91% | 1.02% |
GAAVX GMO Alternative Allocation Fund | 8.67% | 8.78% | 0.00% | 5.18% | 0.91% | 4.10% | 2.41% | 2.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATRFX and GAAVX have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATRFX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to GAAVX (1.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATRFX dropped -35.17% vs GAAVX's -9.59%.
GAAVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATRFX and GAAVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer