PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATHM vs. BIDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ATHM vs. BIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Autohome Inc. (ATHM) and Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATHM achieves a -17.48% return, which is significantly lower than BIDU's -15.70% return. Over the past 10 years, ATHM has outperformed BIDU with an annualized return of 0.24%, while BIDU has yielded a comparatively lower -3.61% annualized return.


ATHM

1D
-0.38%
1M
10.73%
YTD
-17.48%
6M
-16.62%
1Y
-22.20%
3Y*
-8.56%
5Y*
-18.31%
10Y*
0.24%

BIDU

1D
-1.43%
1M
-13.81%
YTD
-15.70%
6M
-11.06%
1Y
30.76%
3Y*
-7.53%
5Y*
-10.78%
10Y*
-3.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATHM vs. BIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATHM
Autohome Inc.
-17.48%-7.61%-1.25%-2.48%5.77%-70.20%25.88%2.28%22.26%155.81%
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
-15.70%54.98%-29.20%4.12%-23.13%-31.19%71.08%-20.30%-32.28%42.45%

Correlation

The correlation between ATHM and BIDU is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.53

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2013

0.48

The correlation between ATHM and BIDU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

ATHM:

$533.38M

BIDU:

$38.05B

EPS

ATHM:

CN¥5.70

BIDU:

CN¥3.78

PE Ratio

ATHM:

21.82

BIDU:

197.04

PEG Ratio

ATHM:

0.56

BIDU:

8.95

PS Ratio

ATHM:

2.02

BIDU:

1.99

PB Ratio

ATHM:

0.16

BIDU:

0.96

Total Revenue (TTM)

ATHM:

CN¥5.87B

BIDU:

CN¥128.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

ATHM:

CN¥4.32B

BIDU:

CN¥54.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

ATHM:

CN¥483.30M

BIDU:

CN¥23.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Autohome Inc.

Baidu, Inc.

Return for Risk

ATHM vs. BIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATHM
ATHM Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ATHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATHM Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
ATHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATHM Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank

BIDU
BIDU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
BIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATHM vs. BIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Autohome Inc. (ATHM) and Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATHMBIDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.89

1.15

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.54

0.90

-1.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.97

1.85

-2.82

ATHM vs. BIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATHM Sharpe Ratio is -0.73, which is lower than the BIDU Sharpe Ratio of 0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATHM and BIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATHM vs. BIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATHM drawdown since its inception was -85.09%, which is greater than BIDU's maximum drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATHM and BIDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATHMBIDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-85.09%

-77.47%

-7.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-41.04%

-34.41%

-6.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.42%

-50.73%

+4.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.92%

-63.13%

-5.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.09%

-77.47%

-7.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-83.28%

-67.60%

-15.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-47.94%

-35.60%

-12.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

22.91%

16.64%

+6.27%

Volatility

ATHM vs. BIDU - Volatility Comparison

Autohome Inc. (ATHM) and Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) have volatilities of 13.84% and 13.48%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATHMBIDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.84%

13.48%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.92%

35.62%

-10.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.43%

50.55%

-20.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

46.38%

51.98%

-5.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.75%

46.30%

+0.45%

Dividends

ATHM vs. BIDU - Dividend Comparison

ATHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%, while BIDU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ATHM
Autohome Inc.
9.74%8.04%6.63%6.17%1.73%2.95%0.77%0.00%0.97%
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ATHM vs. BIDU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Autohome Inc. and Baidu, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B20222023202420252026
1.05B
31.88B
(ATHM) Total Revenue
(BIDU) Total Revenue
Values in CNY except per share items

ATHM vs. BIDU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Autohome Inc. and Baidu, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-50.0%0.0%50.0%100.0%20222023202420252026
75.5%
38.9%
Portfolio components
ATHM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autohome Inc. reported a gross profit of 791.41M and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 75.5%.

BIDU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.41B and revenue of 31.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.

ATHM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autohome Inc. reported an operating income of -34.41M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of -3.3%.

BIDU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.17B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

ATHM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Autohome Inc. reported a net income of 93.68M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.

BIDU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a net income of 3.42B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


ATHM and BIDU have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATHM has higher volatility (13.84%) compared to BIDU (13.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATHM dropped -85.09% vs BIDU's -77.47%.

BIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.61 vs -0.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATHM and BIDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer