PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATH.TO vs. REGB.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATH.TO vs. REGB.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ATH.TO is traded in CAD, while REGB.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the REGB.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 44.95% return, which is significantly higher than REGB.L's 20.81% return.


ATH.TO

1D
0.10%
1M
-6.60%
YTD
44.95%
6M
45.36%
1Y
81.64%
3Y*
52.56%
5Y*
59.73%
10Y*
21.70%

REGB.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-12.60%
YTD
20.81%
6M
19.51%
1Y
119.74%
3Y*
4.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATH.TO vs. REGB.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
ATH.TO
Athabasca Oil Corporation
44.95%31.89%27.82%73.03%102.52%36.78%
REGB.L
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
20.81%80.30%-30.19%-20.64%-26.77%-20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between ATH.TO and REGB.L is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2021

0.19

The correlation between ATH.TO and REGB.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.19 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATH.TO vs. REGB.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATH.TO
ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

REGB.L
REGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
REGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
REGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
REGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
REGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
REGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATH.TO vs. REGB.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATH.TOREGB.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

5.75

-1.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.30

13.50

-1.19

ATH.TO vs. REGB.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the REGB.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATH.TO and REGB.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATH.TO vs. REGB.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than REGB.L's maximum drawdown of -72.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and REGB.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATH.TOREGB.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.41%

-72.82%

-26.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-20.50%

-20.93%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.62%

-58.28%

+32.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.24%

-29.82%

-15.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.56%

-45.33%

-28.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.66%

8.91%

-2.25%

Volatility

ATH.TO vs. REGB.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) is 12.89%, while VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (REGB.L) has a volatility of 13.91%. This indicates that ATH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than REGB.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATH.TOREGB.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.89%

13.91%

-1.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.02%

34.38%

-2.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

37.70%

46.99%

-9.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.58%

48.05%

+1.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.54%

48.05%

+13.49%

Dividends

ATH.TO vs. REGB.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATH.TO nor REGB.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


ATH.TO and REGB.L have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATH.TO and REGB.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer