ATH.TO vs. PLTI.L
ATH.TO (Athabasca Oil Corporation) is a stock, while PLTI.L (IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by Leverage Shares. Over the past year, ATH.TO returned 92.65% vs -34.00% for PLTI.L. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ATH.TO vs. PLTI.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ATH.TO is traded in CAD, while PLTI.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PLTI.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 52.92% return, which is significantly higher than PLTI.L's -31.38% return.
ATH.TO
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 53.35%
- YTD
- 52.92%
- 1Y
- 92.65%
- 3Y*
- 46.06%
- 5Y*
- 67.31%
- 10Y*
- 22.88%
- ALL TIME*
- -1.72%
PLTI.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -9.30%
- 6M
- -31.54%
- YTD
- -31.38%
- 1Y
- -34.00%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6,412.45%
ATH.TO vs. PLTI.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 52.92% | 24.87% |
PLTI.L IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP | -31.38% | 10,880.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATH.TO and PLTI.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2025 | 0.01 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATH.TO vs. PLTI.L — Risk / Return Rank
ATH.TO
PLTI.L
ATH.TO vs. PLTI.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP (PLTI.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ATH.TO | PLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 0.93 | +0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.31 | -0.58 | +4.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.96 | -0.87 | +12.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ATH.TO vs. PLTI.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than PLTI.L's maximum drawdown of -58.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and PLTI.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATH.TO | PLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.41% | -58.41% | -41.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.61% | -58.41% | +36.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.63% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -42.24% | -55.09% | +12.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.45% | -33.26% | -40.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.78% | 38.97% | -31.19% |
Volatility
ATH.TO vs. PLTI.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) is 11.79%, while IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP (PLTI.L) has a volatility of 13.28%. This indicates that ATH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTI.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATH.TO | PLTI.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.79% | 13.28% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.71% | 32.39% | -0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.43% | 62.43% | -24.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 49.22% | 9,851.95% | -9,802.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.51% | 9,851.95% | -9,790.44% |
Dividends
ATH.TO vs. PLTI.L - Dividend Comparison
ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PLTI.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 58.06%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PLTI.L IncomeShares Palantir (PLTR) Options ETP | 58.06% | 11.63% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATH.TO and PLTI.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ATH.TO and PLTI.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer