ATH.TO vs. FEPG.L

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

ATH.TO (Athabasca Oil Corporation) is a stock, while FEPG.L (REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF) is Derivative Income fund actively managed by HANetf. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

ATH.TO vs. FEPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

ATH.TO is traded in CAD, while FEPG.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FEPG.L values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATH.TO achieves a 52.92% return, which is significantly higher than FEPG.L's -1.03% return.

ATH.TO

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.47%
• 6M: 53.35%
• YTD: 52.92%
• 1Y: 92.65%
• 3Y*: 46.06%
• 5Y*: 67.31%
• 10Y*: 22.88%
• ALL TIME*: -1.72%

FEPG.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -6.42%
• 6M: 1.07%
• YTD: -1.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATH.TO vs. FEPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation	52.92%	21.21%
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF	-1.03%	8.66%

Correlation

The correlation between ATH.TO and FEPG.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

ATH.TO vs. FEPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATH.TO

ATH.TO Risk / Return Rank: 92
ATH.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ATH.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
ATH.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 91
ATH.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
ATH.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

FEPG.L

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATH.TO vs. FEPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Athabasca Oil Corporation (ATH.TO) and REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF (FEPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATH.TO	FEPG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.43	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.96	—	—

Drawdowns

ATH.TO vs. FEPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATH.TO drawdown since its inception was -99.41%, which is greater than FEPG.L's maximum drawdown of -37.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATH.TO and FEPG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATH.TO	FEPG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.41%	-37.44%	-61.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-21.61%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.37%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-94.63%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-42.24%	-27.90%	-14.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.45%	-21.36%	-52.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.78%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ATH.TO	FEPG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.79%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	31.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.43%	45.79%	-7.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.22%	45.79%	+3.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.51%	45.79%	+15.72%

Dividends

ATH.TO vs. FEPG.L - Dividend Comparison

ATH.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 27.80%.

Position	TTM	2025
ATH.TO Athabasca Oil Corporation	0.00%	0.00%
FEPG.L REX Tech Innovation Premium Income UCITS ETF	27.80%	11.50%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATH.TO and FEPG.L in my portfolio?

ATH.TO and FEPG.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.