ATEYY vs. PL

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

ATEYY (Advantest Corp DRC) and PL (Planet Labs PBC) are both stocks. ATEYY operates in Semiconductor Equipment & Materials (Technology), while PL operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials). Over the past 5 years, ATEYY returned 50.50%/yr vs 25.63%/yr for PL. At a 0.29 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ATEYY vs. PL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEYY achieves a 38.53% return, which is significantly lower than PL's 57.96% return.

ATEYY

• 1D: 4.13%
• 1M: 2.59%
• YTD: 38.53%
• 6M: 38.14%
• 1Y: 197.06%
• 3Y*: 71.51%
• 5Y*: 50.50%
• 10Y*: 52.65%

PL

• 1D: -8.84%
• 1M: -25.16%
• YTD: 57.96%
• 6M: 70.78%
• 1Y: 480.07%
• 3Y*: 106.65%
• 5Y*: 25.63%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATEYY vs. PL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ATEYY Advantest Corp DRC	38.53%	122.70%	68.99%	111.43%	-33.43%	-0.43%
PL Planet Labs PBC	57.96%	388.12%	63.56%	-43.22%	-29.27%	-37.24%

Correlation

The correlation between ATEYY and PL is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.32
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 26, 2021	0.29

Fundamentals

Market Cap ATEYY : $127.67B PL : $10.76B
EPS ATEYY : ¥520.21 PL : -$1.17
PS Ratio ATEYY : 17.92 PL : 29.61
PB Ratio ATEYY : 25.59 PL : 24.26
Total Revenue (TTM) ATEYY : ¥1.14T PL : $335.61M
Gross Profit (TTM) ATEYY : ¥736.09B PL : $186.28M
EBITDA (TTM) ATEYY : ¥533.69B PL : -$125.70M

Return for Risk

ATEYY vs. PL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEYY

ATEYY Risk / Return Rank: 93
ATEYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
ATEYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
ATEYY Omega Ratio Rank: 89
ATEYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ATEYY Martin Ratio Rank: 94

PL

PL Risk / Return Rank: 97
PL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
PL Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PL Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PL Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PL Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATEYY vs. PL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) and Planet Labs PBC (PL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ATEYY	PL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.87	4.62	-1.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.15	4.16	-1.02
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.55	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.07	11.79	-5.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.34	36.80	-20.46

ATEYY vs. PL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATEYY Sharpe Ratio is 2.87, which is lower than the PL Sharpe Ratio of 4.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEYY and PL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ATEYY vs. PL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEYY drawdown since its inception was -56.48%, smaller than the maximum PL drawdown of -85.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEYY and PL.

Drawdown Indicators

	ATEYY	PL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.48%	-85.73%	+29.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-33.24%	-40.23%	+6.99%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-44.70%	-55.17%	+10.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-56.48%	-85.73%	+29.25%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-56.48%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.76%	-39.40%	+27.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.23%	-49.90%	+35.67%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.32%	12.88%	-0.56%

Volatility

ATEYY vs. PL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) is 27.35%, while Planet Labs PBC (PL) has a volatility of 39.48%. This indicates that ATEYY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ATEYY	PL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	27.35%	39.48%	-12.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	55.16%	78.71%	-23.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	70.37%	102.61%	-32.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.29%	80.98%	-27.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.58%	79.91%	-31.33%

Dividends

ATEYY vs. PL - Dividend Comparison

Neither ATEYY nor PL has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ATEYY Advantest Corp DRC	0.00%	0.11%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.18%	1.24%
PL Planet Labs PBC	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ATEYY and PL in my portfolio?

ATEYY and PL have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ATEYY or PL?

PL has higher volatility (39.48%) compared to ATEYY (27.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATEYY dropped -56.48% vs PL's -85.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.62 vs 2.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.