PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATEYY vs. FLJP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATEYY vs. FLJP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATEYY achieves a 38.37% return, which is significantly higher than FLJP's 16.23% return.


ATEYY

1D
2.93%
1M
-3.62%
YTD
38.37%
6M
29.92%
1Y
237.06%
3Y*
77.03%
5Y*
49.06%
10Y*
52.36%

FLJP

1D
0.33%
1M
6.40%
YTD
16.23%
6M
17.97%
1Y
32.70%
3Y*
18.66%
5Y*
9.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATEYY vs. FLJP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATEYY
Advantest Corp DRC
38.37%122.70%68.99%111.43%-33.43%27.37%30.96%176.84%12.51%-19.63%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
16.23%26.79%6.99%20.00%-16.57%0.99%15.76%18.99%-14.01%2.22%

Correlation

The correlation between ATEYY and FLJP is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017

0.46

The correlation between ATEYY and FLJP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATEYY vs. FLJP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATEYY
ATEYY Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
ATEYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATEYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATEYY Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
ATEYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATEYY Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

FLJP
FLJP Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
FLJP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLJP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLJP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
FLJP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLJP Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATEYY vs. FLJP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) and Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ATEYYFLJPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.33

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.18

2.47

+4.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.97

8.62

+11.35

ATEYY vs. FLJP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATEYY Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the FLJP Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATEYY and FLJP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ATEYYFLJPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.61

1.74

+1.87

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.51

+0.43

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.15

0.45

+0.70

Drawdowns

ATEYY vs. FLJP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATEYY drawdown since its inception was -56.48%, which is greater than FLJP's maximum drawdown of -32.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATEYY and FLJP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATEYYFLJPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.48%

-32.49%

-23.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.24%

-13.30%

-19.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-44.70%

-14.17%

-30.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.48%

-32.49%

-23.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.86%

-0.07%

-11.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.22%

-9.37%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.93%

3.80%

+8.13%

Volatility

ATEYY vs. FLJP - Volatility Comparison

Advantest Corp DRC (ATEYY) has a higher volatility of 16.87% compared to Franklin FTSE Japan ETF (FLJP) at 4.11%. This indicates that ATEYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLJP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATEYYFLJPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.87%

4.11%

+12.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.48%

14.72%

+34.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

66.17%

18.92%

+47.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.18%

17.75%

+34.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

47.98%

17.79%

+30.19%

Dividends

ATEYY vs. FLJP - Dividend Comparison

ATEYY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLJP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ATEYY
Advantest Corp DRC
0.00%0.11%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.18%1.24%
FLJP
Franklin FTSE Japan ETF
4.43%5.15%4.56%3.00%1.92%2.40%1.51%2.26%1.50%0.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATEYY and FLJP have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATEYY has higher volatility (16.87%) compared to FLJP (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATEYY dropped -56.48% vs FLJP's -32.49%.

ATEYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATEYY and FLJP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer