PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ATESX vs. WFSPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ATESX vs. WFSPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund (ATESX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ATESX achieves a 5.46% return, which is significantly lower than WFSPX's 8.19% return.


ATESX

1D
-2.58%
1M
-3.34%
YTD
5.46%
6M
3.91%
1Y
11.02%
3Y*
6.48%
5Y*
4.49%
10Y*

WFSPX

1D
-1.43%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
8.19%
6M
6.86%
1Y
22.29%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
13.11%
10Y*
15.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ATESX vs. WFSPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ATESX
Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund
5.46%5.56%7.21%8.12%-9.25%11.06%18.02%20.31%3.72%16.12%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
8.19%17.83%24.94%26.25%-18.14%28.63%18.43%31.45%-4.83%21.27%

Correlation

The correlation between ATESX and WFSPX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017

0.62

The correlation between ATESX and WFSPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.59 (5 years) to 0.80 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ATESX vs. WFSPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ATESX
ATESX Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
ATESX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ATESX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
ATESX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
ATESX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
ATESX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

WFSPX
WFSPX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
WFSPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WFSPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
WFSPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
WFSPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
WFSPX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ATESX vs. WFSPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund (ATESX) and iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ATESXWFSPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.34

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.34

2.67

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.54

11.99

-9.45

ATESX vs. WFSPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ATESX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the WFSPX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ATESX and WFSPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ATESX vs. WFSPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ATESX drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum WFSPX drawdown of -58.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATESX and WFSPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ATESXWFSPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.87%

-58.21%

+45.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.92%

-8.90%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.73%

-18.74%

+8.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.87%

-24.51%

+11.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.24%

-3.13%

-3.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.69%

-12.76%

+9.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.67%

1.98%

+2.69%

Volatility

ATESX vs. WFSPX - Volatility Comparison

Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund (ATESX) has a higher volatility of 6.55% compared to iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K (WFSPX) at 4.90%. This indicates that ATESX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFSPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ATESXWFSPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.55%

4.90%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.90%

9.93%

-1.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.00%

12.56%

-0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.73%

16.98%

-6.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.12%

18.04%

-6.92%

ATESX vs. WFSPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ATESX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is higher than WFSPX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

ATESX vs. WFSPX - Dividend Comparison

ATESX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while WFSPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ATESX
Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%1.30%7.45%0.00%0.00%11.78%7.70%6.02%0.00%0.00%
WFSPX
iShares S&P 500 Index Fund Class K
1.61%1.72%1.41%1.50%2.02%1.82%1.66%1.99%2.00%1.62%2.37%2.49%

Frequently Asked Questions


ATESX and WFSPX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ATESX has higher volatility (6.55%) compared to WFSPX (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATESX dropped -12.87% vs WFSPX's -58.21%.

WFSPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ATESX and WFSPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer