ATESX vs. QAMNX
ATESX (Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund) and QAMNX (Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A) are both Long-Short funds. Over the past 3 years, ATESX returned 9.27%/yr vs 11.66%/yr for QAMNX. At a 0.04 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ATESX charges 2.10%/yr vs 1.86%/yr for QAMNX.
Performance
ATESX vs. QAMNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATESX achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly higher than QAMNX's 0.05% return.
ATESX
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- 6.89%
- YTD
- 12.03%
- 6M
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 9.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.37%
- 10Y*
- —
QAMNX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- 0.76%
- YTD
- 0.05%
- 6M
- 2.49%
- 1Y
- 3.27%
- 3Y*
- 11.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ATESX vs. QAMNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATESX Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund | 12.03% | 5.56% | 7.21% | 8.12% | -9.25% | 2.45% |
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | 0.05% | 10.00% | 17.33% | 4.71% | 9.19% | 12.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATESX and QAMNX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2021 | 0.04 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATESX vs. QAMNX — Risk / Return Rank
ATESX
QAMNX
ATESX vs. QAMNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund (ATESX) and Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATESX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.10 | +0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 0.80 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.15 | 1.84 | +2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATESX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83 | 0.50 | +1.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.87 | 0.82 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
ATESX vs. QAMNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATESX drawdown since its inception was -12.87%, smaller than the maximum QAMNX drawdown of -17.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATESX and QAMNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATESX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.87% | -17.97% | +5.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.92% | -4.16% | -4.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.73% | -4.16% | -6.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -12.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.40% | -1.98% | +1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.69% | -5.15% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.57% | 1.81% | +2.76% |
Volatility
ATESX vs. QAMNX - Volatility Comparison
Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund (ATESX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A (QAMNX) at 2.22%. This indicates that ATESX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QAMNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATESX | QAMNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 2.22% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.81% | 5.11% | +1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.41% | 6.61% | +3.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.42% | 13.86% | -3.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.97% | 13.86% | -2.89% |
ATESX vs. QAMNX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATESX has a 2.10% expense ratio, which is higher than QAMNX's 1.86% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATESX vs. QAMNX - Dividend Comparison
ATESX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QAMNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATESX Anchor Risk Managed Equity Strategies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.30% | 7.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.78% | 7.70% | 6.02% |
QAMNX Federated Hermes MDT Market Neutral A | 1.53% | 1.53% | 1.85% | 5.89% | 11.74% | 20.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATESX and QAMNX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATESX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to QAMNX (2.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATESX dropped -12.87% vs QAMNX's -17.97%.
ATESX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATESX and QAMNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer