ATACX vs. TTIFX
ATACX (ATAC Rotation Fund) and TTIFX (Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past 5 years, ATACX returned -0.38%/yr vs 2.32%/yr for TTIFX. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ATACX charges 1.74%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for TTIFX.
Performance
ATACX vs. TTIFX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ATACX achieves a 18.32% return, which is significantly higher than TTIFX's 0.28% return.
ATACX
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- 5.90%
- YTD
- 18.32%
- 6M
- 15.84%
- 1Y
- 28.25%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- -0.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.34%
TTIFX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 0.28%
- 6M
- 0.68%
- 1Y
- 4.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.76%
- 5Y*
- 2.32%
- 10Y*
- —
ATACX vs. TTIFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATACX ATAC Rotation Fund | 18.32% | 18.74% | 5.05% | 2.10% | -25.80% | -10.55% | 72.81% | 7.72% | -11.44% | 20.38% |
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund | 0.28% | 6.79% | -2.91% | 6.04% | 0.93% | 8.25% | 5.13% | 4.99% | -2.45% | 0.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between ATACX and TTIFX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2017 | 0.33 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ATACX vs. TTIFX — Risk / Return Rank
ATACX
TTIFX
ATACX vs. TTIFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ATAC Rotation Fund (ATACX) and Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ATACX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.38 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.80 | 2.47 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.78 | 7.41 | +2.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ATACX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.56 | 1.89 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.40 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.50 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
ATACX vs. TTIFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ATACX drawdown since its inception was -51.26%, which is greater than TTIFX's maximum drawdown of -13.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ATACX and TTIFX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ATACX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -51.26% | -13.21% | -38.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.34% | -2.11% | -5.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.94% | -9.04% | -9.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.75% | -9.04% | -37.71% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.19% | -1.64% | -8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.78% | -2.13% | -14.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 0.68% | +2.17% |
Volatility
ATACX vs. TTIFX - Volatility Comparison
ATAC Rotation Fund (ATACX) has a higher volatility of 9.73% compared to Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund (TTIFX) at 0.77%. This indicates that ATACX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTIFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ATACX | TTIFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.73% | 0.77% | +8.96% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.90% | 1.98% | +11.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.95% | 2.75% | +15.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.32% | 5.92% | +14.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.49% | 5.89% | +14.60% |
ATACX vs. TTIFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ATACX has a 1.74% expense ratio, which is higher than TTIFX's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
ATACX vs. TTIFX - Dividend Comparison
ATACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than TTIFX's 3.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATACX ATAC Rotation Fund | 1.56% | 1.85% | 0.92% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 13.13% | 0.90% | 1.10% | 8.15% |
TTIFX Goldman Sachs TacticalTiltOverlayFund | 3.00% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 5.33% | 0.84% | 2.02% | 4.71% | 1.09% | 0.00% | 0.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ATACX and TTIFX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ATACX has higher volatility (9.73%) compared to TTIFX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ATACX dropped -51.26% vs TTIFX's -13.21%.
TTIFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ATACX and TTIFX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer